DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-85110-3_21
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Global Workspace Framework for Combining Reasoning Systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
(5 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Other examples include the IsaScheme system by Montano Rivas [60], which employs a scheme-based approach to mathematical theory exploration; the IsaCosy system by Johansson et al [41] which performs inductive theory formation by synthesising conjectures from the available constants and free variables; and the MATHsAiD system by McCasland [55], which applies inference rules to user-provided axioms, and classifies the resulting proved statements as facts (results of no intrinsic mathematical interest), lemmas (statements which might be useful in the proof of subsequent theorems), or theorems (either routine or significant results). A survey of next generation automated theory formation is given in [64], including Pease's philosophically-inspired system HRL [63], which provides a computational representation of Lakatos's theory [46], and Charnley's cognitively-inspired system [22] based on Baar's theory of the Global Workspace [11].…”
Section: Mathematical Elementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other examples include the IsaScheme system by Montano Rivas [60], which employs a scheme-based approach to mathematical theory exploration; the IsaCosy system by Johansson et al [41] which performs inductive theory formation by synthesising conjectures from the available constants and free variables; and the MATHsAiD system by McCasland [55], which applies inference rules to user-provided axioms, and classifies the resulting proved statements as facts (results of no intrinsic mathematical interest), lemmas (statements which might be useful in the proof of subsequent theorems), or theorems (either routine or significant results). A survey of next generation automated theory formation is given in [64], including Pease's philosophically-inspired system HRL [63], which provides a computational representation of Lakatos's theory [46], and Charnley's cognitively-inspired system [22] based on Baar's theory of the Global Workspace [11].…”
Section: Mathematical Elementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A second example is the Slant system for story generation [34], in which the blackboard model combines separate subsystems dealing with plot, figuration, and the narrative discourse tasks during the generation process. Yet another application of the blackboard system was described by John Charnley and Simon Colton [8] for combining reasoning systems used in discovering mathematical theorems and generating conjectures.…”
Section: Blackboard Architecturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this architecture, a number of independent agents interact together through a shared memory space called the blackboard to arrive at a solution to the problem. It was originally proposed for speech understanding [15] but now has been successfully applied to solve many problems in different domains [7,8,20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this architecture, a number of independent agents interact together through a shared memory space called the blackboard to arrive at a solution to the problem. It was originally proposed for speech understanding [15] but now has been successfully applied to solve many problems in different domains [7,8,20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%