2017
DOI: 10.1126/science.aak9704
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A global view of meiotic double-strand break end resection

Abstract: DNA double-strand breaks that initiate meiotic recombination are exonucleolytically processed. This 5′→3′ resection is a central, conserved feature of recombination but remains poorly understood. To address this lack, we mapped resection endpoints genome-wide at high resolution in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Full-length resection requires Exo1 exonuclease and the DSB-responsive kinase Tel1, but not Sgs1 helicase. Tel1 also promotes efficient and timely resection initiation. Resection endpoints display pronounced… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

20
216
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 169 publications
(242 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
20
216
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this model, the size changes are a consequence of aberrant control of DSB numbers along with a change in nucleolytic DSB processing. This model is consistent with detection of a substantial subpopulation of unresected DSBs in Tel1-deficient cells (Mimitou et al 2017). This model also readily accounts for the apparent contribution of Rec114 phosphorylation and for the observation that reducing DSB numbers (by Spo11 +/− heterozygosity) in an Atm −/− background partially suppresses the changes in SPO11-oligo sizes (Lange et al 2011).…”
Section: Tel1 and Dsb Processingsupporting
confidence: 69%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this model, the size changes are a consequence of aberrant control of DSB numbers along with a change in nucleolytic DSB processing. This model is consistent with detection of a substantial subpopulation of unresected DSBs in Tel1-deficient cells (Mimitou et al 2017). This model also readily accounts for the apparent contribution of Rec114 phosphorylation and for the observation that reducing DSB numbers (by Spo11 +/− heterozygosity) in an Atm −/− background partially suppresses the changes in SPO11-oligo sizes (Lange et al 2011).…”
Section: Tel1 and Dsb Processingsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…One model to explain these findings is that Tel1 acts early in meiotic DSB processing. Indeed, Tel1 phosphorylates proteins necessary for Spo11 removal from DNA ends, such as Mre11 and Sae2 (Cartagena-Lirola et al 2006;Terasawa et al 2008), and Tel1 is required for both the efficient initiation of DSB resection and the generation of normal-length exonucleolytic resection tracts (Mimitou et al 2017). Thus, altered oligo sizes may reflect changes in the positions of Mre11-dependent endonucleolytic cleavage (Cannavo and Cejka 2014) and/or decreased 3 ′ →5 ′ exonuclease activity of Mre11 (Garcia et al 2011).…”
Section: Tel1 and Dsb Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sensitivity of the 3′ ssDNA of resected DSBs to ssDNA-specific endonucleases provides a tool to map resection endpoints by sequencing the region where ssDNA transitions to dsDNA (Figure 1) (Mimitou et al, 2017). We isolate genomic DNA of meiotic cells in low-melting point agarose plugs to protect the DNA from random shearing.…”
Section: Overview Of S1-seqmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have shown that the sequential treatment with S1 nuclease and T4 DNA polymerase can degrade the 2-nt 5′ overhang of unresected DSBs to which Spo11 is still covalently bound (Mimitou et al, 2017). We therefore reasoned that S1-seq can provide a facile method for nucleotide-resolution mapping of the unresected Spo11 DSBs that accumulate in sae2Δ or rad50S mutants (Alani, Padmore, & Kleckner, 1990; McKee & Kleckner, 1997; Prinz, Amon, & Klein, 1997).…”
Section: Adaptations Of S1-seqmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation