2018
DOI: 10.1038/s41559-018-0709-x
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A global test of ecoregions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
93
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 93 publications
(98 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
3
93
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Our ecoregions differed markedly from the Brazilian official vegetation units (Veloso et al 1991) and from the WWF ecoregions (Olson et al 2001, Dinerstein et al 2017 (Fig. woody plants) ecoregions are necessary complements to physiognomy-based and multi-taxa/ physiography-based maps (Smith et al 2018), being potentially useful in different situations. woody plants) ecoregions are necessary complements to physiognomy-based and multi-taxa/ physiography-based maps (Smith et al 2018), being potentially useful in different situations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Our ecoregions differed markedly from the Brazilian official vegetation units (Veloso et al 1991) and from the WWF ecoregions (Olson et al 2001, Dinerstein et al 2017 (Fig. woody plants) ecoregions are necessary complements to physiognomy-based and multi-taxa/ physiography-based maps (Smith et al 2018), being potentially useful in different situations. woody plants) ecoregions are necessary complements to physiognomy-based and multi-taxa/ physiography-based maps (Smith et al 2018), being potentially useful in different situations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…Ecoregions are relatively large land units containing distinct natural communities and species assemblages delimited by their contemporary distribution and with boundaries that approximate their original extent prior to major land-use change (Olson et al 2001). Biogeographical units like ecoregions may be the closest we can get to map metacommunities because they reflect sharp boundaries in species turnover (Marcilio-Silva et al 2017, Smith et al 2018) and predictable species associations based on similar ecological requirements and non-neutral interactions Legendre 2012, Smith et al 2018). Biogeographical units like ecoregions may be the closest we can get to map metacommunities because they reflect sharp boundaries in species turnover (Marcilio-Silva et al 2017, Smith et al 2018) and predictable species associations based on similar ecological requirements and non-neutral interactions Legendre 2012, Smith et al 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Ecoregions are an appropriate scale to measure diversity as they represent distinct biogeographic and ecological entities (Smith et al. ), they have a reasonable sample size, and they contain highly variable numbers of species. For each ecoregion, we estimated the mean value across grid cells for each climatic and edaphic variable, as well as net primary productivity (NPP).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ecoregions represent ecologically and geographically distinct units that typically share a common fauna (Smith et al, 2018). Ecoregions represent ecologically and geographically distinct units that typically share a common fauna (Smith et al, 2018).…”
Section: Geographic Samplingmentioning
confidence: 99%