2015
DOI: 10.1186/s12918-015-0222-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A global sensitivity analysis approach for morphogenesis models

Abstract: BackgroundMorphogenesis is a developmental process in which cells organize into shapes and patterns. Complex, non-linear and multi-factorial models with images as output are commonly used to study morphogenesis. It is difficult to understand the relation between the uncertainty in the input and the output of such ‘black-box’ models, giving rise to the need for sensitivity analysis tools. In this paper, we introduce a workflow for a global sensitivity analysis approach to study the impact of single parameters a… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[12]; the exact values of these parameters do not qualitatively affect the results of the model, and have modest quantitative impact; for a detailed sensitivity analysis see Refs. [12,47].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[12]; the exact values of these parameters do not qualitatively affect the results of the model, and have modest quantitative impact; for a detailed sensitivity analysis see Refs. [12,47].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several previous studies applied GSA in the calibration of the complex models, such as environmental and biological models. However, ranking of parameter sensitivities is the usual method in the GSA approach (Boas et al, 2015 ), and most of the past studies did not provide specific criteria that could be used to distinguish influential and non-influential parameters. Additionally, some studies only focused on the variation in the steady state or integrated measures (e.g., area under the curve) rather than full time-course behaviors (Safta et al, 2015 ; Zhang et al, 2015 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unlike local SA, global SA (GSA) calculates the contribution from the variety of all model parameters, including both single parameter effects and multiple parameter interactions. This approach has been widely applied to biological models (McNally et al, 2011 ; Boas et al, 2015 ; Loizou et al, 2015 ; Lumen et al, 2015 ). For example, McNally et al ( 2011 ) provided a GSA workflow for PBPK models that begins with preliminary screening from elementary effect (EE)-based Morris method to eliminate (i.e., fix at nominal values) the parameters with negligible impact on the model output, and then used variance-based GSA to determine the influential parameters in the PBPK model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In vivo, the tip cell is regularly replaced by trailing endothelial cells in the sprout, a phenomenon called "tip cell overtaking" [22]. In our models such tip cell overtaking can occur as a side effect of sprout extensions [23], suggesting the possibility that tip cell overtaking is non-functional and that Dll4-Notch signaling acts to ensure that the cell at the tip assumes the tip cell phenotype, as opposed to a model where the tip cell actively migrates to the tip.…”
Section: Mechanical Cell-ecm Interactionsmentioning
confidence: 96%