2018
DOI: 10.1038/s41559-017-0432-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A global perspective on the trophic geography of sharks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
75
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 101 publications
(79 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
(50 reference statements)
4
75
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Changes in tuna δ 13 C values can in turn be described by the following equation:normalδ13normalCtuna=1)(1+εfc1,000normalδ13normalCnormalp-εfc,where ε fc is the overall fractionation associated with trophic transfers and is considered to be low (~0.5‰ to 1.8‰ per trophic level), therefore we used 4‰ for tuna that are considered to be at a trophic position of ~4 (Olson et al, ). As a comparison, Bird et al () found an average difference of 4.6‰ between phytoplankton and sharks on a global scale.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Changes in tuna δ 13 C values can in turn be described by the following equation:normalδ13normalCtuna=1)(1+εfc1,000normalδ13normalCnormalp-εfc,where ε fc is the overall fractionation associated with trophic transfers and is considered to be low (~0.5‰ to 1.8‰ per trophic level), therefore we used 4‰ for tuna that are considered to be at a trophic position of ~4 (Olson et al, ). As a comparison, Bird et al () found an average difference of 4.6‰ between phytoplankton and sharks on a global scale.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… Caution is therefore needed when using SI values from the literature because the pre‐treatments vary widely between studies; the compared SI data thus reflect the intrinsic differences in the tissue composition combined with the influence of the pre‐treatments which may confound ecological interpretation; Our study, conducted on a limited number of samples, shows that the difference among pre‐treatments extends beyond the elasmobranch species and should therefore be confirmed with tests on additional species; The pre‐treatment comparative approach that we followed for ragged‐tooth sharks and Cape knifejaws could be adapted for other species prior to large scale studies to provide conversion factors; The next step would entail the evaluation of the pre‐treatments in their abilities in removing solely the biological molecules of interest (urea, TMAO, lipids). This would allow us to choose the best pre‐treatment which interferes least with the amino acid composition; We reiterate the call for a standardised approach to pre‐treatments which would greatly benefit larger‐scale comparisons of SI studies, particularly when global comparisons of wide‐ranging species are starting to emerge (e.g …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is likely to affect carbon and nitrogen contents and δ 13 C and δ 15 N values, as well as C:N ratios. Critically important information for comparisons between studies (e.g …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent study utilizing carbon and nitrogen stable isotope ratios (δ 13 C and δ 15 N) suggested that Winter Skate individuals may predominantly forage within a specific latitudinal range (Shipley et al, in press), a pattern that has also been hypothesized for oceanic sharks (Bird et al. ). This result suggests that high rates of movement, particularly off coastal New York and New Jersey, could reflect primary foraging grounds laying outside of the immediate capture and tagging region.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%