A global perspective on coal-fired power plants and burden of lung cancer

Abstract

BackgroundExposure to ambient particulate matter generated from coal-fired power plants induces long-term health consequences. However, epidemiologic studies have not yet focused on attributing these health burdens specifically to energy consumption, impeding targeted intervention policies. We hypothesize that the generating capacity of coal-fired power plants may be associated with lung cancer incidence at the national level.MethodsAge- and sex-adjusted lung cancer incidence from every country with electrical plants using coal as primary energy supply were followed from 2000 to 2016. We applied a Poisson regression longitudinal model, fitted using generalized estimating equations, to estimate the association between lung cancer incidence and per capita coal capacity, adjusting for various behavioral and demographic determinants and lag periods.ResultsThe average coal capacity increased by 1.43 times from 16.01 gigawatts (GW) (2000~2004) to 22.82 GW (2010~2016). With 1 kW (KW) increase of coal capacity per person in a country, the relative risk of lung cancer increases by a factor of 59% (95% CI = 7.0%~ 135%) among males and 85% (95% CI = 22%~ 182%) among females. Based on the model, we estimate a total of 1.37 (range = 1.34 ~ 1.40) million standardized incident cases from lung cancer will be associated with coal-fired power plants in 2025.ConclusionsThese analyses suggest an association between lung cancer incidence and increased reliance on coal for energy generation. Such data may be helpful in addressing a key policy question about the externality costs and estimates of the global disease burden from preventable lung cancer attributable to coal-fired power plants at the national level.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (10.1186/s12940-019-0448-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

<p>Estimation of Generalized Impact Fraction and Population Attributable Fraction of Hypertension Based on JNC-IV and 2017 ACC/AHA Guidelines for Cardiovascular Diseases Using Parametric G-Formula: Tehran Lipid and Glucose Study (TLGS)</p>

“…Levin's formula and the Miettinen formula for PAF estimation and Morgenstern's proposed method for GIF estimation are the conventional methods. 45 A lack of confounders and effect modification, the use of the crude risk ratio (RR), 46,47 the complexity of estimating the effect of joint interventions, and the inability to adjust time-varying confounders are the most important limitations of the formulas mentioned. 10 The parametric G-formula can provide valid PAF or GIF estimates by overcoming the limitations of the conventional methods for PAF and GIF estimation through generating a counterfactual population and using appropriate models.…”

Clinical Pharmacists in Chronic Care

“…Smoking causes at least 80% of lung cancer deaths [405]. and increased reliance on coal for energy generation [406]. Other possible reasons are exposure to indoor and outdoor air pollution, exposure to radiation, and occupational exposure to agents such as asbestos, nickel, chromium, and arsenic [407].…”

Alternative Treatments for Cancer Prevention and Cure [Part 1]

“…Smoking causes at least 80% of lung cancer deaths [130]. concluded association between lung cancer incidence and increased reliance on coal for energy generation [131]. Other possible reasons are exposure to indoor and outdoor air pollution, exposure to radiation, and occupational exposure to agents such as asbestos, nickel, chromium, and arsenic [132].…”