2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2011.07.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A global overview of health insurance administrative costs: what are the reasons for variations found?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
1
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
(27 reference statements)
1
20
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Administrative costs of private insurance are higher than government financed insurance schemes [27, 28]; our study confirms this finding. Higher administrative costs lead to lower expenditure on patient benefits in view of limited government resources.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Administrative costs of private insurance are higher than government financed insurance schemes [27, 28]; our study confirms this finding. Higher administrative costs lead to lower expenditure on patient benefits in view of limited government resources.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Functionality reflects the firm's ability to carry out the health insurance function and is assessed by member growth rates, premium collection rates and renewal rates. Administrative cost computed as a percentage of total expenditure and as a share of total revenue (Mathauer and Nicolle, 2011), and claims ratio (which indicates the ability to provide insurance with the funds generated) (ILO, 2007) serve as proxies for efficiency.…”
Section: Conceptual Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there has been relatively little research into the administrative costs of CBHI schemes in low-income settings and the relative cost of different administrative activities. Yet, it is acknowledged that voluntary insurance schemes typically result in high administrative costs, relative to compulsory schemes ( Mathauer and Nicolle 2011 ). This is due to the bureaucracy required to set premiums and manage funds and costs associated with advertising, card distribution and revenue collection ( Mossialos and Thompson 2004 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%