2020
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2005.03567
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A global model of the magnetorotational instability in protoneutron stars

Alexis Reboul-Salze,
Jérôme Guilet,
Raphaël Raynaud
et al.

Abstract: Context. Magnetars are isolated neutron stars characterized by their variable high-energy emission which is powered by the dissipation of enormous internal magnetic fields. The measured spin-down of magnetars constrains the magnetic dipole to be in the range of 10 14 to 10 15 G. The magnetorotational instability (MRI) is considered to be a promising mechanism to amplify the magnetic field in fastrotating protoneutron stars and form magnetars. This scenario is supported by many local studies which have shown th… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
(90 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The exponential growth of the magnetic field is beneficial to amplify the weak seed field of the stellar core to the dynamically relevant level. The magnetic field amplification due to the magnetorotational instability (MRI; Balbus & Hawley 1991) is a candidate for the efficient field amplification mechanism in the rotating stellar cores (Akiyama et al 2003;Masada et al 2006Masada et al , 2007Masada et al , 2012Masada et al , 2015Obergaulinger et al 2009;Sawai et al 2013b;Sawai & Yamada 2014, 2016Mösta et al 2015;Rembiasz et al 2016;Reboul-Salze et al 2020).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The exponential growth of the magnetic field is beneficial to amplify the weak seed field of the stellar core to the dynamically relevant level. The magnetic field amplification due to the magnetorotational instability (MRI; Balbus & Hawley 1991) is a candidate for the efficient field amplification mechanism in the rotating stellar cores (Akiyama et al 2003;Masada et al 2006Masada et al , 2007Masada et al , 2012Masada et al , 2015Obergaulinger et al 2009;Sawai et al 2013b;Sawai & Yamada 2014, 2016Mösta et al 2015;Rembiasz et al 2016;Reboul-Salze et al 2020).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Strong magnetic fields may suppress the low-𝑇/|𝑊 | instability (Fu & Lai 2011;Muhlberger et al 2014). The impact of the magnetorotational instability (MRI) on the explosion mechanism is also a long-standing issue (Akiyama et al 2003;Masada et al 2015;Sawai & Yamada 2016;Guilet & Müller 2015;Mösta et al 2015;Rembiasz et al 2016;Reboul-Salze et al 2020). The MRI should certainly affect the angular momentum profile and affect the low-𝑇/|𝑊 | instability (Bugli et al 2018).…”
Section: Summary and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The choice of this high central rotation rate is due to the desire to maximize the Ω effect. Note that the equation of state (EoS) and the rotation profile we use are more appropriate for an NS than for a PNS (e.g., [21]). However, the aim of this preliminary work is to verify whether the dynamo model could be a realistic scheme for generating proto-magnetar, taking into account, for the first time, non-ideal effects in general relativity.…”
Section: Model and Numerical Set-upmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the original magnetar model [16] the strength of the magnetic field is the result of the growth a) Electronic mail: luca.delzanna@unifi.it of the seed field amplified by the dynamo mechanism -a process through which a rotating, convecting, and electrically conducting fluid can generate a magnetic field by self-inductive action converting kinetic energy into magnetic energy -in the proto-neutron star (PNS), the remnant of the supernova explosion which represents the first phase of life of a NS. The amplification of the magnetic field by a turbulent dynamo can occur either by a convective dynamo (e.g., [17; 18]) or the magnetorotational instability (MRI, e.g., [19][20][21]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%