2019
DOI: 10.3390/rs11161893
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Global Model for Estimating Tropospheric Delay and Weighted Mean Temperature Developed with Atmospheric Reanalysis Data from 1979 to 2017

Abstract: Precise modeling of tropospheric delay and weighted mean temperature (T m ) is critical for Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) positioning and meteorology. However, the model data in previous models cover a limited time span, which limits the accuracy of these models. Besides, the vertical variations of tropospheric delay and T m are not perfectly modeled in previous studies, which affects the performance of height corrections. In this study, we used the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecast… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
39
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As we can see, on a global scale, GGNTm outperformed all the other two models, especially at high pressure levels. The GTrop has been proved to be considerably better than GPT3 (Sun et al, 2019), owing to its use of the T m lapse rate, although its T m results still had large errors at high pressure levels, which is most likely to result from neglecting the nonlinear vertical variation in T m . The large bias and RMSE of the GWMT_D results were possibly because its modeling was based on NCEP reanalysis data, and there may exist differences between the reanalysis P. Sun et al: A new global grid-based weighted mean temperature model Figure 6.…”
Section: Comparison With Era5 Hourly Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As we can see, on a global scale, GGNTm outperformed all the other two models, especially at high pressure levels. The GTrop has been proved to be considerably better than GPT3 (Sun et al, 2019), owing to its use of the T m lapse rate, although its T m results still had large errors at high pressure levels, which is most likely to result from neglecting the nonlinear vertical variation in T m . The large bias and RMSE of the GWMT_D results were possibly because its modeling was based on NCEP reanalysis data, and there may exist differences between the reanalysis P. Sun et al: A new global grid-based weighted mean temperature model Figure 6.…”
Section: Comparison With Era5 Hourly Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent studies, some researchers used a T m lapse rate, the rate of change in T m with altitude, to correct the effect of the height element on T m , e.g., IGPT2w (Huang et al, 2019b), GTm_R (Li et al, 2020), and GPT2wh (Yang et al, 2020). The GTrop model (Sun et al, 2019), developed for predicting both ZTD and T m , also took into account the T m lapse rate, and it outperforms GPT2w obviously at altitudes under 10 km.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reanalysis data generated by NWMs are usually used as the data source in the development of NMTm models, and one of the most representative NMTm models is the Global Pressure and Temperature 2 wet (GPT2w) model, which is an empirical model providing empirical values of various meteorological elements near the Earth's surface including T m [17]. In recent years, the research focus of NMTm models has shifted to the study on the impact of height differences on the model accuracy, and a series of NMTm models such as the GTm_R model [18], IGPT2w model [19,20], GWMT-D model [11] and GTrop-Tm model [21] have been developed. The application scope of NMTm models has even been extended from the ground to the tropopause [22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Huang et al, 2019b), GTm_R (Li et al, 2020) and GPT2wh (Yang et al, 2020). The GTrop model (Sun et al, 2019), developed for predicting both ZTD and , also took into account the lapse-rate, and it outperforms GPT2w obviously at altitudes under 10 km.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%