2016
DOI: 10.1038/ncomms11666
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A global meta-analysis on the ecological drivers of forest restoration success

Abstract: Two billion ha have been identified globally for forest restoration. Our meta-analysis encompassing 221 study landscapes worldwide reveals forest restoration enhances biodiversity by 15–84% and vegetation structure by 36–77%, compared with degraded ecosystems. For the first time, we identify the main ecological drivers of forest restoration success (defined as a return to a reference condition, that is, old-growth forest) at both the local and landscape scale. These are as follows: the time elapsed since resto… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

25
372
0
6

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 444 publications
(403 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
(111 reference statements)
25
372
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…As is commonplace with ecological meta-analyses8103738, the data necessary to determine variance with any confidence were not available in the majority (79% in our case) of outcome measures. In addition, meta-analysis theory suggests that when among-study variation is much higher than within-study variation, parameter estimates from random-effects models are nearly the same as those obtained with unweighted models37383940.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As is commonplace with ecological meta-analyses8103738, the data necessary to determine variance with any confidence were not available in the majority (79% in our case) of outcome measures. In addition, meta-analysis theory suggests that when among-study variation is much higher than within-study variation, parameter estimates from random-effects models are nearly the same as those obtained with unweighted models37383940.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In addition, meta-analysis theory suggests that when among-study variation is much higher than within-study variation, parameter estimates from random-effects models are nearly the same as those obtained with unweighted models37383940. Nevertheless, unweighted models may yield confidence intervals that are too narrow, as they do not account for the within- and among-study variation components that are accounted for in random-effects models.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many revegetation programs have been implemented worldwide. These include China's Grain‐for‐Green Program (J. Li, Peng, & Li, ), the worldwide Bonn Challenge (Verdone & Seidl, ), and the ‘Initiative 20 × 20’ Project in Latin America and the Caribbean (Crouzeilles et al, ). However, substantial land use changes may have adverse effects (Y. Chen et al, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Evaluating restoration success does not only depend on choosing an appropriate ecological indicator, but also on the taxonomic group considered (Crouzeilles et al ). For instance, compared to other taxonomic groups, birds may show earlier signs of recovery because they are able to make use of young new‐growth forests (Crouzeilles et al ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%