2018
DOI: 10.1038/nature25181
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A global map of travel time to cities to assess inequalities in accessibility in 2015

Abstract: The economic and man-made resources that sustain human wellbeing are not distributed evenly across the world, but are instead heavily concentrated in cities. Poor access to opportunities and services offered by urban centres (a function of distance, transport infrastructure, and the spatial distribution of cities) is a major barrier to improved livelihoods and overall development. Advancing accessibility worldwide underpins the equity agenda of 'leaving no one behind' established by the Sustainable Development… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
625
0
7

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 821 publications
(689 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
4
625
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…We characterised each site according to five characteristicscalculated in a 1-km radius buffer around its coordinatestwo binary and three continuous: protected (if coordinates fall within a protected area 47 ; Extended Fig. 5) versus non-protected; forest (if > 60% of the 1 km buffer around the point is forested 48 ) versus non-forest (< 10% forested; sites with intermediate forest cover were removed from analyses); altitude 49 ; agricultural suitability 50 ; and remoteness 51 . In addition, we classified each forest site according to three continuous variables: canopy height 52 ; forest contiguity (proportion of forest cover 48 , 0.6 to 1); and wilderness level (opposite of human footprint 53 ).…”
Section: Site Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We characterised each site according to five characteristicscalculated in a 1-km radius buffer around its coordinatestwo binary and three continuous: protected (if coordinates fall within a protected area 47 ; Extended Fig. 5) versus non-protected; forest (if > 60% of the 1 km buffer around the point is forested 48 ) versus non-forest (< 10% forested; sites with intermediate forest cover were removed from analyses); altitude 49 ; agricultural suitability 50 ; and remoteness 51 . In addition, we classified each forest site according to three continuous variables: canopy height 52 ; forest contiguity (proportion of forest cover 48 , 0.6 to 1); and wilderness level (opposite of human footprint 53 ).…”
Section: Site Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To account for disparities between rural and urban, we used gridded maps of urban accessibility obtained from the European Commission Joint Research Centre Global Environment Monitoring Unit (JRC) 28 and from the Malaria Atlas project 29,30 for 2000 and 2015, respectively ( Figure S6, Supplementary information). Accessibility is time (minutes) taken to travel from a grid cell in the map to a city using land-based travel and employing the minimum cost.…”
Section: Sources Of Covariatesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Travel time is a widely used measure for accessibility, which reflects the ease of travel as determined by the quality of service provided by the transportation [23,30]. We employed a door-to-door approach to calculate times associated with every stage in a journey between origin and destination [31].…”
Section: Measurement Of Travel Timementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study area (entire China) was divided into raster grid cells with a spatial resolution of 1 km [30] and the cell value indicated the time spent to traverse a cell. The cell value was calculated as Cost = 100/V × 60, where Cost is the travel time (min per 100 km) and V calculated based on following speed settings: 90, 70, 50 and 20 km/h for the expressway, national highway, provincial and county highway and other roads, respectively ( Figure 5a).…”
Section: Construction Of Frictional Surfacementioning
confidence: 99%