2020
DOI: 10.1214/20-aoas1332
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A global-local approach for detecting hotspots in multiple-response regression

Abstract: We tackle modelling and inference for variable selection in regression problems with many predictors and many responses. We focus on detecting hotspots, that is, predictors associated with several responses. Such a task is critical in statistical genetics, as hotspot genetic variants shape the architecture of the genome by controlling the expression of many genes and may initiate decisive functional mechanisms underlying disease endpoints. Existing hierarchical regression approaches designed to model hotspots … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
29
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
1
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, the propensity of each SNP to be associated with many traits, i.e., to be a hotspot, is explicitly modelled using a SNP-specific parameter, θ s , similarly as in our earlier work [5].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Finally, the propensity of each SNP to be associated with many traits, i.e., to be a hotspot, is explicitly modelled using a SNP-specific parameter, θ s , similarly as in our earlier work [5].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We first describe the type of posterior output produced by EPISPOT and its performance in a simple problem where no modules are involved, i.e., the active epigenetic marks exert their influence on all associated SNP-trait pairs. We benchmark our approach against our earlier joint model, ATLASQTL [5], also tailored to the modelling of hotspots but which does not accommodate the epigenetic marks, as well as with the purely marginal screening approach, MATRIXEQTL [2], which tests each SNP-trait pair one-by-one and does not involve any epigenetic information. Figure 2 is attributable to an effective use of the three informative marks and not to other intrinsic differences between the two models; more evidence on this is provided in the next simulation experiment.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations