2011
DOI: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2010.01578.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A global experiment suggests climate warming will not accelerate litter decomposition in streams but might reduce carbon sequestration

Abstract: The decomposition of plant litter is one of the most important ecosystem processes in the biosphere and is particularly sensitive to climate warming. Aquatic ecosystems are well suited to studying warming effects on decomposition because the otherwise confounding influence of moisture is constant. By using a latitudinal temperature gradient in an unprecedented global experiment in streams, we found that climate warming will likely hasten microbial litter decomposition and produce an equivalent decline in detri… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

29
267
5
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 267 publications
(302 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
29
267
5
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This stimulation was expected since the activities of most temperate fungi and invertebrate species are stimulated by warming within the temperature range observed (Azevedo-Pereira et al 2006;Dang et al 2009;Ferreira and Chauvet 2011a, b). This stimulation is also in agreement with metabolic theory (Brown et al 2004) and with studies where litter was incubated along natural thermal gradients (Irons et al 1994;Fabre and Chauvet 1998;Swan and Palmer 2004;Friberg et al 2009;Boyero et al 2011b). Although an increase in water temperature by 10°C is over that expected for temperate woodland streams solely due to global warming (IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) 2007; Morrill et al 2005), increases of this magnitude may occur under global-warming scenarios that include removal of riparian vegetation, water abstraction, or warm-water discharge from power plants (Poff and Mathews 1986;Stefan and Sinokrot 1993).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 69%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…This stimulation was expected since the activities of most temperate fungi and invertebrate species are stimulated by warming within the temperature range observed (Azevedo-Pereira et al 2006;Dang et al 2009;Ferreira and Chauvet 2011a, b). This stimulation is also in agreement with metabolic theory (Brown et al 2004) and with studies where litter was incubated along natural thermal gradients (Irons et al 1994;Fabre and Chauvet 1998;Swan and Palmer 2004;Friberg et al 2009;Boyero et al 2011b). Although an increase in water temperature by 10°C is over that expected for temperate woodland streams solely due to global warming (IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) 2007; Morrill et al 2005), increases of this magnitude may occur under global-warming scenarios that include removal of riparian vegetation, water abstraction, or warm-water discharge from power plants (Poff and Mathews 1986;Stefan and Sinokrot 1993).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…The relative contributions of microbes and invertebrates to litter decomposition determines the amount of carbon that is mineralized, released into the atmosphere, incorporated into secondary production, and stored in the system for longer periods (Boyero et al 2011b). In this study, invertebrate-driven litter decomposition was more strongly stimulated (*29) over the 10°C temperature gradient than microbial-driven litter decomposition.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%
See 3 more Smart Citations