The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2006
DOI: 10.1002/jps.20481
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A global examination of allometric scaling for predicting human drug clearance and the prediction of large vertical allometry**This work was presented at the American Association of Pharmaceutical Scientists Annual meeting, Salt Lake City, USA, Oct. 26, 2003.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 123 publications
(22 reference statements)
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Mordenti and colleagues reported exponents that ranged from 0.65 to 0.84 for clearance and from 0.84 to 1.02 for V ss for five human proteins (19). Broader ranges for the allometric exponent for systemic clearance were also reported by Mahmood (0.64–1.29 for 15 proteins) (20) and Tang and Mayersohn (0.56–1.06 for 10 proteins) (21). Lave and colleagues found allometric exponents for clearance and V ss of 0.71 and 0.94 for human IFN-α.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…Mordenti and colleagues reported exponents that ranged from 0.65 to 0.84 for clearance and from 0.84 to 1.02 for V ss for five human proteins (19). Broader ranges for the allometric exponent for systemic clearance were also reported by Mahmood (0.64–1.29 for 15 proteins) (20) and Tang and Mayersohn (0.56–1.06 for 10 proteins) (21). Lave and colleagues found allometric exponents for clearance and V ss of 0.71 and 0.94 for human IFN-α.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…The value of the exponent b is typically <1, 16,78 meaning that CL increases slower than weight, i.e., heavier animals have relatively lower CL (per unit of body weight), compared to smaller animals. Sometimes, however, the exponent is estimated at >1, 62,79 indicating that this method is not the most appropriate. To address this, but still use simple allometry, mathematical corrections to decrease and thus improve the mAb human CL prediction were suggested.…”
Section: Simple Allometrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Diazepam is in fact a good example of where microdosing could be useful, as its clearance is significantly over-predicted by allometric scaling. Diazepam, along with certain other drugs such as warfarin, reboxetine and tamsulosin, are classed as having “a large verti cal allometry” where clearance is over-predicted, by over 3000% in the case of diazepam [49]. These magnitudes of errors have not been seen thus far with microdosing, even in the case of warfarin where target-mediated disposition is a demonstrated mechanism on non-linearity.…”
Section: The Utility Of Microdosingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[49] ‡ The dose range is given between a microdose and a therapeutic dose in the study cited or for a typical therapeutic dose if compared to the literature (see comment column). § Summarised mean parameters. ¶ Data for zidovudine were ambiguous in that one publication reported scalable pharmacokinetics in PBMCs [65], whilst the other reported non-linear pharmacokinetics [66]. Since the plasma pharmacokinetics for both papers reported saleable pharmacokinetics, zidovudine has been included with those drugs where microdosing was predictive within a factor of 2.…”
Section: Article Highlightsmentioning
confidence: 99%