2018
DOI: 10.1177/2332649218783220
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Global Critical Race and Racism Framework: Racial Entanglements and Deep and Malleable Whiteness

Abstract: Twenty years after Bonilla-Silva developed the analytic components of a structural race perspective and called for “comparative work on racialization in various societies,” U.S.-centric race theory continues to be mostly rooted in a U.S. focus. What is missing is a framework that explores race and racism as a modern global project that takes shape differently in diverse structural and ideological forms across all geographies but is based in global white supremacy. Drawing from Bonilla-Silva’s national racializ… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
80
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 115 publications
(83 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
0
80
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…and, again, Moore's (2014) and Henrick's (2018) comparative historical analyses of Supreme Court jurisprudence and congressional decision-making. Relatedly, while TRI is a U.S.-centered theory, racism is a modern global project; one which gives rise to particular racial orders situated in a broader relational field defined by white supremacy (Christian 2018;Mills 2015). As such, transnational scholars could study localized patterns of racial ignorance and how these relate across contexts.…”
Section: Deploying Tri Empiricallymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…and, again, Moore's (2014) and Henrick's (2018) comparative historical analyses of Supreme Court jurisprudence and congressional decision-making. Relatedly, while TRI is a U.S.-centered theory, racism is a modern global project; one which gives rise to particular racial orders situated in a broader relational field defined by white supremacy (Christian 2018;Mills 2015). As such, transnational scholars could study localized patterns of racial ignorance and how these relate across contexts.…”
Section: Deploying Tri Empiricallymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consider Kendi’s (2016) study of racially contradictory ideas among “great American thinkers” over U.S. history; and, again, Moore’s (2014) and Henricks’s (2018) comparative historical analyses of Supreme Court jurisprudence and congressional decision making. Relatedly, although TRI is a U.S.-centered theory, racism is a modern global project, one that gives rise to particular racial orders situated in a broader relational field defined by white supremacy (Christian 2018; Mills 2015). As such, transnational scholars could study localized patterns of racial ignorance and how these relate across contexts.…”
Section: Tri Revisitedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We understand Afro-pessimism and CRT as related (but sometimes conflicting) groups of theory that are underused in sociology. Although CRT is making important mainstream inroads in the study of the state (Bracey 2015), the production of racial ignorance (Mueller 2018), and more recently globalization (Christian forthcoming), Afro-pessimism remains largely unacknowledged, even though these bodies of thought can trace a shared intellectual lineage through the likes of sociologists such as Du Bois (1935) and Patterson (1982).…”
Section: Response To Weddington’s Critiquesmentioning
confidence: 99%