2020
DOI: 10.1111/ele.13662
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A global analysis of song frequency in passerines provides no support for the acoustic adaptation hypothesis but suggests a role for sexual selection

Abstract: Animals use acoustic signals for communication, implying that the properties of these signals can be under strong selection. The acoustic adaptation hypothesis predicts that species in dense habitats emit lower‐frequency sounds than those in open areas because low‐frequency sounds propagate further in dense vegetation than high‐frequency sounds. Signal frequency may also be under sexual selection because it correlates with body size and lower‐frequency sounds are perceived as more intimidating. Here, we evalua… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
61
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(76 citation statements)
references
References 103 publications
6
61
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(a) Variation in response to the acoustic environment Animals modify the intensity, frequency, duration and repetition of their signals to compensate for variation in acoustic conditions in their environment (see [13][14][15][16]). If these adjustments involve immediate audio-vocal feedback [17][18][19] rather than memorized information from previous experience, they would not be classed as learned changes, based on the definition of learning applied herein.…”
Section: Non-learned Inputs Into Vocal Variationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(a) Variation in response to the acoustic environment Animals modify the intensity, frequency, duration and repetition of their signals to compensate for variation in acoustic conditions in their environment (see [13][14][15][16]). If these adjustments involve immediate audio-vocal feedback [17][18][19] rather than memorized information from previous experience, they would not be classed as learned changes, based on the definition of learning applied herein.…”
Section: Non-learned Inputs Into Vocal Variationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…by propagating further or resisting noise better) than unlearned calls or songs (cf. [131]). Evidence of rapid changes in songs in response to urban noise [132,133] are consistent with this hypothesis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Evidence for acoustic adaptation across animals is mixed, with many studies demonstrating lower mass-corrected vocal frequencies for species inhabiting dense vegetation compared with more open environments (Ryan and Brenowitz 1985, Boncoraglio and Saino 2007, Derryberry 2009, Ey and Fischer 2009, Kirschel et al 2009, and others showing limited evidence of habitat effects on acoustic signals (Daniel and Blumstein 1998, Jain and Balakrishnan 2011, Mason and Burns 2015, Tietze et al 2015, Graham et al 2016, Mikula et al 2020. Implicit to most acoustic adaptation studies is the idea that a dense signaling environment Fig.…”
Section: Ecological and Sexual Selection On Vocal Frequencymentioning
confidence: 99%