2014
DOI: 10.5812/ircmj.15393
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Glance at Methods for Cleft Palate Repair

Abstract: Context:Cleft palate is the second most common birth defect and is considered as a challenge for pediatric plastic surgeons. There is still a general lack of a standard protocol and patients often require multiple surgical interventions during their lifetime along with disappointing results.Evidence Acquisition:PubMed search was undertaken using search terms including 'cleft palate repair', 'palatal cleft closure', 'cleft palate + stem cells', 'cleft palate + plasma rich platelet', 'cleft palate + scaffold', '… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 86 publications
(73 reference statements)
0
21
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This procedure is intended to add new bone between the jaw and the maxillary sinuses (in the caudal section of the maxillary sinus) [Sarkar and Lee, 2015]. Among the various techniques that are available to reconstruct deficient bone or fill a ridge, such as using a synthetic bone substitute like ceramics, bioglass, and glass ceramic compounds, autologous grafting is still a predictable and well-documented surgical approach [Tavakolinejad et al, 2014]. However, the major limiting factor for autogenous bone graft reconstruction is that the procedure is generally invasive and is associated with donor site complications, including infection, malformation, and pain [Sarkar and Lee, 2015].…”
Section: Mscs For Treating Oral and Craniofacial Bone Injuriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This procedure is intended to add new bone between the jaw and the maxillary sinuses (in the caudal section of the maxillary sinus) [Sarkar and Lee, 2015]. Among the various techniques that are available to reconstruct deficient bone or fill a ridge, such as using a synthetic bone substitute like ceramics, bioglass, and glass ceramic compounds, autologous grafting is still a predictable and well-documented surgical approach [Tavakolinejad et al, 2014]. However, the major limiting factor for autogenous bone graft reconstruction is that the procedure is generally invasive and is associated with donor site complications, including infection, malformation, and pain [Sarkar and Lee, 2015].…”
Section: Mscs For Treating Oral and Craniofacial Bone Injuriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of autogenous bone graft has many drawbacks related to morbidity at the donor site, and patients may present chronic pain at the site, paresthesia of the thigh, and hypertrophic scar. The loss of the graft due to local inflammation, bone resorption, and the development of oronasal fistulas is also frequently associated with unsuccessful repair (Borba et al, 2014;Tavakolinejad et al, 2014;Shafi et al, 2015).…”
Section: First Generation Palatal Reconstruction: Standard Surgical Cmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5,6). Предвари-тельно с помощью бор-машины удаляли компакт-ную пластинку концевых отделов кости в области фрагментов альвеолярного отростка верхней че-люсти или в области небных отростков верхней челюсти.…”
Section: материалы и методыunclassified
“…Для лечения детей с врожденной патологией ЧЛО (врожденными расщелинами губы и неба) применяются МСК при проведении операций по закрытию изъянов твердого неба, а также при закрытии щелей альвеолярного отростка верх-ней челюсти в условиях ее врожденного недораз-вития [6]. Недостаток кости представляет собой проблему, с которой сталкивается врач если воз-никает необходимость восстановления зубного ряда или структур лица.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified