A GIS-Based Multicriteria Evaluation for Aiding Risk Management Pinus pinaster Ait. Forests: A Case Study in Corsican Island, Western Mediterranean Region

Abstract

Forest management can benefit from decision support tools, including GIS-based multicriteria decision-aiding approach. In the Mediterranean region, Pinus pinaster forests play a very important role in biodiversity conservation and offer many socioeconomic benefits. However, the conservation of this species is affected by the increase in forest fires and the expansion of Matsucoccus feytaudi. This paper proposes a methodology based on commonly available data for assessing the values and risks of P. pinaster forests and to generating maps to aid in decisions pertaining to fire and phytosanitary risk management. The criteria for assessing the values (land cover type, legislative tools for biodiversity conservation, environmental tourist sites and access routes, and timber yield) and the risks (fire and phytosanitation) of P. pinaster forests were obtained directly or by considering specific indicators, and they were subsequently aggregated by means of GIS-based multicriteria analysis. This approach was tested on the island of Corsica (France), and maps to aid in decisions pertaining to fire risk and phytosanitary risk (M. feytaudi) were obtained for P. pinaster forest management. Study results are used by the technical offices of the local administration-Corsican Agricultural and Rural Development Agency (ODARC)-for planning the conservation of P. pinaster forests with regard to fire prevention and safety and phytosanitary risks. The decision maker took part in the evaluation criteria study (weight, normalization, and classification of the values). Most suitable locations are given to target the public intervention. The methodology presented in this paper could be applied to other species and in other Mediterranean regions.

Indicators-based spatial SWOT analysis: Supporting the strategic planning and management of complex territorial systems

“…In this respect, one of the most widely used orientations for measuring the sustainability of a system is the criteria and indicators approach (Pasqualini et al, 2011). …”

“…Pasqualini et al, 2011;Horizon 2020;Ferretti and Pomarico, 2013) and the need for proper methodological approaches has been recognized.…”

Use of remote sensing and geographic information systems in the determination of high-risk areas regarding marine traffic in the Istanbul Strait

“…Since the study area was defined by fore-scene and back-scene zone boundaries, segments +1eu, +1as, +2eu, +2as and +3eu will not be used in the analysis. When determining the intersected entities, a risk score is assigned and multiplied by the weight of the risk component as was the case in most of the multi-criteria evaluation techniques (Pasqualini et al, 2011;Santos et al, 2013). Risk scores do not consider scales of oil spills.…”

Site-Selection of Optimal Sites for Bird watching to Ecotourism and Hospitality Development in International Qurigol Wetland

“…In this respect, one of the most widely used orientations for measuring the sustainability of a system is the "criteria and indicators approach" (Pasqualini et al, 2011). In order to analyze decision problems in Ecotourism field and to cope with the above mentioned complexity, the need to integrate spatial data with algorithmic techniques has been recognized and gave rise to a research stream in the context of decision Support Systems (DSS) related to the so-called Spatial Decision Support Systems (SDSS).…”