2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.11.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A GIS-based methodology for predicting walking track stability

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, despite the aesthetic impact of the erosion, the calculated lifetime soil loss from the track was estimated to be approximately 220 million cm 2 , less than estimated to be delivered in a single rainfall event immediately after bushfire [85]. While the extent of damage from such tracks varies due to the level of use, the physical characteristics of the landscape, deterioration, often irreversible (e.g., increased depth -trenching, gullying; widening, 'quagmire development', braiding, duplication), will continue without intervention [87]. While such erosion is typically worst on slopes, in more open areas, 'dense footpath networks' may be developed by anglers moving along a wetland's banks [88].…”
Section: Impacts From Walkingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, despite the aesthetic impact of the erosion, the calculated lifetime soil loss from the track was estimated to be approximately 220 million cm 2 , less than estimated to be delivered in a single rainfall event immediately after bushfire [85]. While the extent of damage from such tracks varies due to the level of use, the physical characteristics of the landscape, deterioration, often irreversible (e.g., increased depth -trenching, gullying; widening, 'quagmire development', braiding, duplication), will continue without intervention [87]. While such erosion is typically worst on slopes, in more open areas, 'dense footpath networks' may be developed by anglers moving along a wetland's banks [88].…”
Section: Impacts From Walkingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Power boats, particularly, may cause 'far-reaching' erosional damage to the shoreline even away from the immediate impact area [102]. The impacts are also likely to increase in parallel with growth in leisure time [20,101,106], wider affordability and new technologies [20,87,107] as diverse as equipment made from lighter weight synthetic fabrics [107] to communication equipment (e.g., cellular and digital telephones, GPS) [87,107].…”
Section: Impacts Of Boatingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recreation opportunities can be maximised by the implementation of appropriate management actions including development and maintenance of National Park infrastructure (Niedziałkowski et al, 2014;Rannow et al, 2014;Watson et al, 2014). Many studies have also identified proper trail management as enhancing recreational use of National Parks (Dixon et al, 2004;Hawes et al, 2013;Leung and Marion, 2000;Leung, 2001, 2004;Monz et al, 2010;Pickering et al, 2010). Most of these previous works were related to the overall problem of trail condition and degradation related to their utilization (e.g.…”
Section: Scenario 3 -Trail Degradation and Natural Restorationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our experiences confirmed time consumption so there will be fair discussion about practicality to repeat these measurements as a part of a potential monitoring program. A combination with GIS-based methodologies could be a more effective tool (Hawes et al, 2013;Ballantyne et al, 2014;Ólafsdóttir and Runnström, 2013) to examine the relationship between trail condition assessment and local physical properties, such as elevation, gradient, soil type and vegetation cover. For further trail monitoring, a recommendation to consider is the possibility of increasing precision of measurements (submeter accuracy GPS units, smaller intervals for measurements between sampling points of 30 m; this will increase time capacity).…”
Section: Decision Treesmentioning
confidence: 99%