2015
DOI: 10.1190/tle34040398.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A GIS-based decision-support approach to deepwater drilling-hazard maps

Abstract: Drilling-hazard maps -sometimes known as drillingfavorability maps -derived from geophysical data are important tools for communicating the spatial variability of geohazards that might be encountered during deepwater operations. Multiattribute utility theory (MAUT) can be generalized to GIS-based map environments to produce drilling-hazard maps within a structured logical framework that allows for more flexibility and easier sensitivity analysis than simple rule-based approaches. The method is applied in a dee… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This requires a detailed spatial analysis of all potential risks and the consideration of additional viable target areas, both regionally and stratigraphically (Sel-vage et al, 2012). For IODP Proposal 909, the sensitive environment associated with high-latitude continental shelves, as well as the likelihood of hydrocarbon occurrences, made a robust risk analysis increasingly important (Hasle et al, 2009;Nadim and Kvalstad, 2007;Li et al, 2016). The geohazard assessment was conducted in line with commercial site safety analyses (Jensen and Cauquil, 2013) whilst focussing on hazards that commonly create risks to drilling operations within both deep water continental margin settings (hydrocarbon occurrences, gas hydrates, near-surface faults, etc.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This requires a detailed spatial analysis of all potential risks and the consideration of additional viable target areas, both regionally and stratigraphically (Sel-vage et al, 2012). For IODP Proposal 909, the sensitive environment associated with high-latitude continental shelves, as well as the likelihood of hydrocarbon occurrences, made a robust risk analysis increasingly important (Hasle et al, 2009;Nadim and Kvalstad, 2007;Li et al, 2016). The geohazard assessment was conducted in line with commercial site safety analyses (Jensen and Cauquil, 2013) whilst focussing on hazards that commonly create risks to drilling operations within both deep water continental margin settings (hydrocarbon occurrences, gas hydrates, near-surface faults, etc.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multicriteria Decision Support Concept stage decision making can also be supported with so-called utility or cost maps created using GIS adaptations of methods such as multi-attribute utility theory (MAUT) or analytical hierarchy process (AHP), both described in Munier (2011) and many other references. 7-Illustrated workflow for regional probabilistic slope stability assessment using a seafloor surface derived from exploration 3D seismic data typically available at the concept stage Another example of the kind of decision support maps that can be made from exploration 3D seismic data typically available at the concept stage is a shallow geohazard and seafloor favorability map, as described by Haneberg et al (2015b). Figure 8 is a schematic illustration of this kind of routing process as performed using a regional 3D seismic data set.…”
Section: Process Based Geohazardmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact the use of GIS techniques, thus far applied to onshore risk assessments, in the characterisation of offshore instability processes has improved our knowledge of the factors that trigger such catastrophic events (McAdoo, 2000). By combining 3D seismic datasets with GIS databases, one can explore the different tools used in GIS spatial analyses (Haneberg et al, 2015), taking advantage of methodologies widely tested onshore.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Offshore slope stability analyses have recently benefited from improvements in data acquisition, data processing and analytical techniques. Some of these improvements allow the computation of models representing the spatial distribution of the physical parameters that may influence the occurrence of mass movements (Urgeles et al, 2006, Micallef et al, 2007, Micallef, 2011, Li et al, 2014, Haneberg et al, 2015.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%