A GIS-Based Approach for Spatially-Explicit Sustainable Development Assessments in East Azerbaijan Province, Iran

Abstract

We propose an efficient integrated approach of spatial decision-making systems and geographical information science for spatially explicit sustainable development mapping. The approach was developed, and its efficiency examined for sustainability assessment in East Azerbaijan Province, Iran. To achieve this goal, sustainable development indicators were employed through GIS decision rule and spatial analysis. Accordingly, 13 main criteria and 44 sub-criteria were identified and prepared as GIS dataset. The fuzzy analytical network process (FANP) method was employed to derive the criteria weights and their significance. We also applied the Global Sensitivity Analysis (GSA) for minimizing the uncertainties associated with the FANP weights. The Ordered Weighted Averaging (OWA) method was applied to aggregate the indicators and develop the sustainable development maps. Results confirmed that integrated GIS-based decision rules can be applied for any sustainable development mapping efficiently. Results of this research present an approach for sustainable development assessment and can be applied for similar research effectually. In the case of East Azerbaijan Province, the detailed results represent the unbalanced sustainable development within the different counties of this province. This requires taking necessary actions to ensure more balanced and just economic development in the province. The degree of sustainable development shows a significant spatial correlation with the industrial activities, employment, demography, poverty and infrastructure properties. The obtained results are of great importance for decision makers to identify efficient approaches in light of sustainable development mapping.

Suitable site selection for transfer stations in a solid waste management system using analytical hierarchy process as a multi-criteria decision analysis: a case study in Azuay-Ecuador

“…It needs to be performed a vast number of times as the Monte Carlo simulation. This approach has been used inMohamadzadeh et al (2020) andFeizizadeh et al (2021); (3) Mathematical models which expressed the relationship between inputs and the solution.…”

A scenario-based approach for urban water management in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic and a case study for the Tabriz metropolitan area, Iran

“…Since several criteria were used to achieve the study objective, an integrated fuzzy system and analytical network process (FANP) approach was applied to derive the criteria weights. The weightings of the selected indicators were obtained based on the integrated approach of fuzzy and ANP, which is the most efficient criteria weighting approach approved by previous research ( Abedi Gheshlaghi et al, 2021 ; Ebrahimy et al, 2020 ; Ghorbanzadeh et al, 2018 ; Mohamadzadeh et al, 2020 ; Omarzadeh et al, 2021 ; Pourmoradian et al, 2021 ). The integrated approach of FANP allows evaluating the internal weight of each indicator.…”

“…Accordingly, a better understanding of the impacts of COVID-19 on UWCPs requires adopting interdisciplinary analytical approaches such as geographical spatial analysis ( Franch-Pardo et al, 2020 ). In this regard, the integrated approach of Geographic Information Systems (GIS) techniques and statistical analysis can be efficiently applied to address complex water scarcity issues (( Ghorbanzadeh et al, 2018 ; Naboureh et al, 2019 ; Satti and Jacobs, 2004 ; Shokati and Feizizadeh, 2019 ): ( Ahasan and Hossain, 2020 ; Mohamadzadeh et al, 2020 ; Omarzadeh et al, 2021 )). Considering the importance of water to human life, as well as its significant role in the industry and the economy, extensive research is required to monitor the UWCPs, particularly in urban environments that deal with water scarcity issues.…”

Urban Resilience Assessment Using Hybrid MCDM Model Based on DEMATEL-ANP Method (DANP)

“…The concept of resilience has been constantly developing and could refer to resilience for adapting in the face of climate change (Rajkovich and Okour 2019), hazard risk management and resilience (Etinay et al 2018; Galderisi and Treccozzi 2017), resilience in energy and environmental security (Keskinen et al 2019), urban resilience Mohamadzadeh et al 2020), and social-ecological system resilience Garmestani et al 2019). The review of the research literature indicate that resilience is a comprehensive concept with several dimensions.…”