2012
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637x/760/1/64
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Giant Sample of Giant Pulses From the Crab Pulsar

Abstract: We observed the Crab pulsar with the 43 m telescope in Green Bank, WV over a timespan of 15 months. In total we obtained 100 hr of data at 1.2 GHz and seven hours at 330 MHz, resulting in a sample of about 95,000 giant pulses (GPs). This is the largest sample, to date, of GPs from the Crab pulsar taken with the same telescope and backend and analyzed as one data set. We calculated power-law fits to amplitude distributions for main pulse (MP) and interpulse (IP) GPs, resulting in indices in the range of 2.1-3.1… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
79
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(88 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
8
79
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results in terms ofβ for the two Parkes subbands are within the range of those reported by Mickaliger et al (2012) between 330 and 1200 MHz (β MP ∼ 2.1-3.1, β IP ∼ 2.4-3.1), but steeper than reported by Bhat et al (2008) between 1300 and 1470 MHz (β = 2.33 ± 0.15, where the MP and IP are combined), except in the case of our 3100 MHz Parkes IP exponent. For the MWA subbands, results are typically steeper than the estimated value at 325 MHz (β MP = 2.61±0.14,β IP = 2.7±0.7) reported by Mikami et al (2016), and are also steeper than the slopes calculated by Karuppusamy et al (2010) between 110-180 MHz (β MP ∼ 1.5-2.4,β IP ∼ 0.7-2.7, with errors typically around ±0.1 for main pulses and ±0.5 for interpulses).…”
Section: Giant Pulse Fluence Distributionssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Our results in terms ofβ for the two Parkes subbands are within the range of those reported by Mickaliger et al (2012) between 330 and 1200 MHz (β MP ∼ 2.1-3.1, β IP ∼ 2.4-3.1), but steeper than reported by Bhat et al (2008) between 1300 and 1470 MHz (β = 2.33 ± 0.15, where the MP and IP are combined), except in the case of our 3100 MHz Parkes IP exponent. For the MWA subbands, results are typically steeper than the estimated value at 325 MHz (β MP = 2.61±0.14,β IP = 2.7±0.7) reported by Mikami et al (2016), and are also steeper than the slopes calculated by Karuppusamy et al (2010) between 110-180 MHz (β MP ∼ 1.5-2.4,β IP ∼ 0.7-2.7, with errors typically around ±0.1 for main pulses and ±0.5 for interpulses).…”
Section: Giant Pulse Fluence Distributionssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…These pulses are incredibly bright, with observed peak flux densities as high as 2.2 MJy in less than 0.9 ns (Hankins & Eilek 2007). Much work has been done characterizing the Crab giant pulses, which seem to follow a power-law distribution in amplitude (Lundgren et al 1995;Bhat et al 2008;Majid et al 2011;Mickaliger et al 2012). Most studies report the index for the differential power-law amplitude distribution, n(S) ∝ S −γ , which gives the number of pulses within some amplitude bin.…”
Section: Pulsar Emissionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most studies report the index for the differential power-law amplitude distribution, n(S) ∝ S −γ , which gives the number of pulses within some amplitude bin. Measurements of the index range from 2 γ 4 for observing frequencies from ν obs = 0.1 − 4 GHz (Mickaliger et al 2012, and reference therein). Since the intrinsic widths of Crab giant pulses can be smaller than the instrumental resolution, the observed peak flux density is often less than the intrinsic value.…”
Section: Pulsar Emissionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The z distribution was motivated by my earlier results (Lorimer 1995) based on the low-frequency surveys. † Data analysis by the Einstein@Home team has so far discovered 23 sources including one highly dispersed millisecond pulsar, while Mickaliger et al (2012) have recently announced the discovery of five further millisecond pulsars. Mean of log-normal reduced to -1.2 -2.1 1.3 36,000 C Uniform surface density over the disk -7.1 2.8 2,670 D Cordes & Chernoff (1998) spin period distribution -12.8…”
Section: A New Analysis Of the Millisecond Pulsar Populationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, multiple analyses of the data often result in additional discoveries (e.g. Keith et al 2009;Eatough et al 2010;Mickaliger et al 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%