2020
DOI: 10.3390/en13051018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Geothermal-Solar Hybrid Power Plant with Thermal Energy Storage

Abstract: The concept of a geothermal-solar power plant is proposed that provides dispatchable power to the local electricity grid. The power plant generates significantly more power in the late afternoon and early evening hours of the summer, when air-conditioning use is high and peak power is demanded. The unit operates in two modes: a) as a binary geothermal power plant utilizing a subcritical Organic Rankine Cycle; and b) as a hybrid geothermal-solar power plant utilizing a supercritical cycle with solar-supplied su… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 23 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This power plant uses isobutane at a maximum pressure of 30 bar for a total net power output of 33.6 MW. The power plant was completed in 2009 for a total cost of 132.9 million USD 2009 and was later upgraded to a hybrid power plant using geothermal, solar thermal, and PV energy [41,42]. The costs of the Stillwater power plant are updated using a cost index ratio of 1.69, which arises from the chemical engineering indices between 2022 and 2009 (CI 2022 /CI 2009 = 1036.9/613.2 = 1.69).…”
Section: Validation Of the Economic Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This power plant uses isobutane at a maximum pressure of 30 bar for a total net power output of 33.6 MW. The power plant was completed in 2009 for a total cost of 132.9 million USD 2009 and was later upgraded to a hybrid power plant using geothermal, solar thermal, and PV energy [41,42]. The costs of the Stillwater power plant are updated using a cost index ratio of 1.69, which arises from the chemical engineering indices between 2022 and 2009 (CI 2022 /CI 2009 = 1036.9/613.2 = 1.69).…”
Section: Validation Of the Economic Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%