1991
DOI: 10.1190/1.1443048
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A geophysical model of the Española Basin, Rio Grande rift, New Mexico

Abstract: A model of the subsurface structure of the eastern part of the Española Basin in the northern Rio Grande rift of New Mexico was constructed from geophysical data obtained since 1983 by the Summer of Applied Geophysical Experience (SAGE) field course. Approximately 742 new gravity observations, 1276 ground magnetic stations, 30 km of seismic refraction lines, 19 km of seismic reflection lines, 22 magnetotelluric stations, and several Schlumberger and dipole‐dipole resistivity lines were established. Our studies… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…on July 23, 2015 specialpapers.gsapubs.org Downloaded from tions within the San Luis Basin (Brister and Gries, this volume; Kluth and Schaftenaar, this volume), Española Basin (Biehler et al, 1991;Cather, 1992), and Albuquerque Basin (Lozinsky, 1988;Russell and Snelson, 1990, and this volume) suggest that such faults did not play a major role in the early tectonic development of these basins. Instead, many of the presently active, moderate to steeply dipping faults appear to have also controlled early deposition within these basins.…”
Section: Regional Relationsmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…on July 23, 2015 specialpapers.gsapubs.org Downloaded from tions within the San Luis Basin (Brister and Gries, this volume; Kluth and Schaftenaar, this volume), Española Basin (Biehler et al, 1991;Cather, 1992), and Albuquerque Basin (Lozinsky, 1988;Russell and Snelson, 1990, and this volume) suggest that such faults did not play a major role in the early tectonic development of these basins. Instead, many of the presently active, moderate to steeply dipping faults appear to have also controlled early deposition within these basins.…”
Section: Regional Relationsmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…The Española basin is a west‐tilted, half graben (Kelley, 1952, 1978; Biehler et al, 1991; Ferguson et al, 1995; Smith, 2004) filled by Santa Fe Group sediments derived from Precambrian‐cored highlands located primarily to the east and north (Galusha and Blick, 1971; Cavazza, 1989; Ingersoll et al, 1990) and by volcaniclastic sediments derived from the Jemez volcanic field (Smith et al, 1970; Ingersoll et al, 1990; Smith, 2004). The western front of the Sangre de Cristo Range marks the eastern‐hinged margin of the Española basin (Kelley, 1978; Biehler et al, 1991; Ferguson et al, 1995). The western structural margin of the Española basin is partly covered by rocks of the Jemez volcanic field, but probably includes a broad zone of north‐trending faults such as the Cañada de Cochiti fault zone (Fig.…”
Section: Regional Geologic Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Yates La Mesa #2 exploration well penetrated 1200 m (3966 ft) of Tesuque Formation in the south‐central part of the basin (Myer and Smith, 2004). However, the thickest Santa Fe Group deposits are believed to occur in the western Española basin beneath the Pajarito Plateau (Kelley, 1978; Biehler et al, 1991; Ferguson et al, 1995; Smith, 2004). The thickness of these deposits is poorly known because the deepest wells on the plateau (e.g., PM‐5 depth 950 m; 3110 ft) do not fully penetrate the basin‐fill sediments.…”
Section: Regional Geologic Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ByWater Lakes project site is geologically located in the east-central area of the Espanola Basin [Biehler, et al 1991] (Figure 3). The Espanola Basin is a set of complex, asymmetric grabens about 70 km long by 60 km wide (a graben is a depressed geologic block bordered by faults).…”
Section: Geologic Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The basin is mainly filled with Tertiary and younger rift fill sediments [Carter and Winter 1995] that comprise the Santa Fe Group rocks, which are characterized as poorly consolidated basin-fill sediments that range in thickness from 0 to 3000 m [Cordell 1979]. The Santa Fe Group is subdivided into two formations (Tesuque and Chamita formations), each with several sub-members that reflect the diverse geology of the alluvial deposits that comprise the Group [Biehler et al 1991;Smith 2004;Cevik 2009]. At the ByWater Lakes site, the Santa Fe Group is approximately 1500 m thick and consists of mainly river, floodplain, and alluvial deposits ranging in age from the Pliocene to the lower Pleistocene (5.3 to 1.8 million years ago).…”
Section: Geologic Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%