2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.cma.2017.09.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A geometrically regularized gradient-damage model with energetic equivalence

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

4
57
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 162 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
4
57
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For this so-called smeared crack approach, classical methods were developed by [1][2][3][4][5]. More recently, nonlocal constitutive models [6], gradient enhanced [7,8] and phase field techniques [8][9][10][11][12] have also been considered within the continuous approach.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For this so-called smeared crack approach, classical methods were developed by [1][2][3][4][5]. More recently, nonlocal constitutive models [6], gradient enhanced [7,8] and phase field techniques [8][9][10][11][12] have also been considered within the continuous approach.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A clear physical interpretation and direct link between the length parameter in the model and the characteristic length of the material is arguable [40]. An alternative geometrical interpretation has been proposed by [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To avoid using an auxiliary field, level set methods have also been utilized . Other approaches, which set out to model cohesive fracture rather exploit the variational phase‐field approach to brittle fracture and attempt to obtain a cohesive‐like fracture behavior by modifying the assumed phase‐field distribution perpendicular to the center of the crack, the degradation function, or attempt to reconstruct the crack opening from the phase field …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The UPM solves the coupled transport equations one after another and transfers the field states among different physical/chemical fields back and forth, avoiding strong coupled description of the multi-fields such as [53][54][55][56][57]. Moreover, the simulations of crack initiation and propagation are not considered, avoiding complex models presented in such as [58][59][60][61][62][63][64][65][66]. The UPM transforms 3D complicated fractures and porous medium into 1D artificial connected pipes in domain space and it uses the equivalent pipe networks to simulate the mass/energy transport processes within a 3D fractured porous medium.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%