After World War II, salvaging monuments which were dama~d or even demolished by bombing, justified urgent restoration treatments using techniques that did not always respect the usual constraints for this kind of work. Afterwards, it was decided by those in charge of the monuments to instigate new restoration works which took into greater account the conservation or «preservation» aspect of the monuments. At the same time, research was undertaken to determine the origin of all types of degradation observed in stone monuments, even those not destroyed during the war. The magnitude of the degradation and the rapidity of its development, even on recently restored monuments, needed a broad study to be carried out to investigate the causes of degradation and, if possible, to suggest ways for its limitation. It was hoped that the results ofthis research would lead to the immediate improvement of the current standards of restoration. This was also the period when many monuments and buildings were extensively cleaned. However, the real benefit of this type of «cleaning» was also questioned, especially because of the abrasion of the often protective calcite crust. Also questioned was the use of replacement stones that were more resistant than the original building stones.It was in this context that studies were carried out on the cathedral of Strasbourg which, in contrast to the majority of French monuments, is constructed in a sandstone lacking in carbonate minerals. Very rapidly it could be established that this sandstone underwent the same alterations as other stones of different chemical and mineralogical compositions. If the erosion caused by frost was well advanced, given the richness of clay in this sandstone, the mechanisms for development of other forms of alteration could lead to the presence of salts and, in particular, to gypsum. All of this had not previously been established due to the difficulty of determining the original constituents of these minerals in the sandstones.The work undertaken on the cathedral of Strasbourg for the last fifteen years has enabled a more precise distinction of the nature of all major forms of degradation observed. It has also favoured the use, in restoration, of sandstone more resistant to alteration than the original stones. This way of restoration has not been reviewed for number of years, but the initial results or outcomes for the stones used during this period, will be the basis for another research.
H. Paquet et al., Soils and Sediments