1999
DOI: 10.1142/s0218348x99000402
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Geometric Platonic Approach to Multifractality and Turbulence

Abstract: A large family of deterministic measures built as projections off fractal functions has been introduced recently.1,2 These constructed measures, which transform either simple multifractals as defined by deterministic cascades3 or uniform measures via fractal interpolating functions,4,5 range from nontrivial multifractals to absolutely continuous measures, and include as a limiting case the Gaussian distribution.6 In this work, examples of deterministic measures which possess multiscaling properties when analyz… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this instance, as in the cosine case, further increasing the amplitude integrates the derived measure dy towards a Gaussian distribution. This result is quite interesting as it generalizes the roads to Gaussianity, via space-filling fractal interpolating functions, already reported (Puente et al, , 1999. Details of such a case shall reported elsewhere.…”
Section: Sample Patterns Via the Nonlinear Fractal-multifractal Approachsupporting
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this instance, as in the cosine case, further increasing the amplitude integrates the derived measure dy towards a Gaussian distribution. This result is quite interesting as it generalizes the roads to Gaussianity, via space-filling fractal interpolating functions, already reported (Puente et al, , 1999. Details of such a case shall reported elsewhere.…”
Section: Sample Patterns Via the Nonlinear Fractal-multifractal Approachsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…In addition to the projections themselves (plotted left to right rather than bottom to top), the figures also include the records' autocorrelation functions (with the ±e −1 levels highlighted), their power spectra (plotted in a log-log scale) and their multifractal spectra (i.e. the "f vs. α" curve, Puente and Obregón, 1999).…”
Section: Nonlinear Extensions Of the Fractal Multifractal Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The purpose of this article is to illustrate by means of few examples that a deterministic fractal-multifractal (FM) repCorrespondence to: C. E. Puente (cepuente@ucdavis.edu) resentation (Puente, 1992(Puente, , 1994, successfully employed to model data sets corresponding to a host of geophysical processes, such as rainfall (Puente and Obregón, 1996;Obregón et al, 2002a, b), turbulence (Puente and Obregón, 1999), and groundwater contamination transport (Puente et al, 2001a, b), may also be used to represent the overall structure of the width function of natural catchments. Figure 1 illustrates the construction of a derived distribution via the FM approach (Puente, 1992(Puente, , 1994.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2)} whose graph has a fractal dimension of 1.485, and the invariant (and hence deterministic) measure dx, as identified in turbulence studies (Puente and Obregón, 1999). As a way of clarification, it should be emphasized that although it may appear to a casual reader that the obtained patterns may depend on the "coin" mentioned above, such is not the case, since the successive iterations are just a suitable Monte Carlo approach that always converges to the same deterministic pattern (Barnsley, 1988).…”
Section: Figmentioning
confidence: 99%