2023
DOI: 10.1007/s00170-023-11181-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A geometric error measurement method for five-axis ultra-precision machine tools

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To identify the dominant errors affecting machining accuracy, a common approach involved removing the workpiece for offline measurement [27][28][29][30]. In this context, a measurement technique based on the double ball bar (DBB) was proposed to address geometric error measurement challenges for five-axis ultra-precision machine tools operating with interpolated five-axis motion [31]. Their suggested method was less constrained by the machine tool's configuration and could measure the geometric errors of a five-axis ultra-precision machine tool with a single setup.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To identify the dominant errors affecting machining accuracy, a common approach involved removing the workpiece for offline measurement [27][28][29][30]. In this context, a measurement technique based on the double ball bar (DBB) was proposed to address geometric error measurement challenges for five-axis ultra-precision machine tools operating with interpolated five-axis motion [31]. Their suggested method was less constrained by the machine tool's configuration and could measure the geometric errors of a five-axis ultra-precision machine tool with a single setup.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, Jiang et al [14] established a new testing procedure to identify and characterize the PIGEs of the rotary axes in a five-axis machine, through a four-step process with double ball bars. Song et al [21] carried out measurement experiments with double ball bars to extract seven PIGEs for the geometric errors of a five-axis UPM machine. It is, thus, clear that these proposed methods were carried out only to identify PIGEs, but the machining form errors would not be fully considered with crucial PIGEs under the machining process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%