2020
DOI: 10.1112/plms.12389
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A geometric approach to the sup‐norm problem for automorphic forms: the case of newforms on GL2(Fq(T)) with squarefree level

Abstract: The sup-norm problem in analytic number theory asks for the largest value taken by a given automorphic form. We observe that the function-field version of this problem can be reduced to the geometric problem of finding the largest dimension of the ith stalk cohomology group of a given Hecke eigensheaf at any point. This problem, in turn, can be reduced to the intersectiontheoretic problem of bounding the 'polar multiplicities' of the characteristic cycle of the Hecke eigensheaf, which in known cases is the nil… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Remark 1.5. In a function field setting analogous to that of Theorem 1.1, Sawin [Saw21] has used geometric techniques to establish (among other things) the sup-norm bound 𝑁 1 4 +𝛼 𝑞 , where 𝛼 𝑞 > 0 tends to zero as the cardinality q of the underlying finite field tends to ∞. We do not see any obstruction to adapting the techniques of this paper to the function field setting, where we expect they would give the improved bound 𝜀 𝑁 1 4 +𝜀 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Remark 1.5. In a function field setting analogous to that of Theorem 1.1, Sawin [Saw21] has used geometric techniques to establish (among other things) the sup-norm bound 𝑁 1 4 +𝛼 𝑞 , where 𝛼 𝑞 > 0 tends to zero as the cardinality q of the underlying finite field tends to ∞. We do not see any obstruction to adapting the techniques of this paper to the function field setting, where we expect they would give the improved bound 𝜀 𝑁 1 4 +𝜀 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Remark 1.5. In a function field setting analogous to that of Theorem 1.1, Sawin [Saw21] has used geometric techniques to establish (among other things) the sup-norm bound ≪ N 1 4 +αq , where α q > 0 tends to zero as the cardinality q of the underlying finite field tends to ∞. We do not see any obstruction to adapting the techniques of this paper to the function field setting, where we expect they would give the improved bound ≪ ε N 1 4 +ε .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%