29th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control 1990
DOI: 10.1109/cdc.1990.203643
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A geometric approach to 2-D implicit systems

Abstract: We consider the existence of solutions with certain geometric properties for the implicit Roesser model (IRM) and the second implicit Fornasini-Marchesini model. We define invariant subspaces and some geometric notions which do not have one-dimensional counterparts. Using these notions, we analyze a Fornasini-Marchesini-like model which encompasses two alternative representations of the IRM. For the IRM we consider boundary conditions on any side of the boundary to investigate existence of the solutions.We pro… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
(14 reference statements)
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Over the last twenty years, several extensions of important geometric concepts, such as controlled invariance, have been proposed for 2-D latent variable models such as the Fornasini-Marchesini and Roesser state-space models, [5], [6], [12], [13]. While definitions of controlled invariance and output-nulling subspaces are not difficult to establish for FM-I, FM-II or Kurek models, a definition for conditioned invariant subspaces is less natural, since duality cannot be exploited as in the 1-D case.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Over the last twenty years, several extensions of important geometric concepts, such as controlled invariance, have been proposed for 2-D latent variable models such as the Fornasini-Marchesini and Roesser state-space models, [5], [6], [12], [13]. While definitions of controlled invariance and output-nulling subspaces are not difficult to establish for FM-I, FM-II or Kurek models, a definition for conditioned invariant subspaces is less natural, since duality cannot be exploited as in the 1-D case.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, Fornasini-Marchesini models are such that their dual is not in the form described by (1), or the class corresponding to the FM-I or FM-II models. To overcome this difficulty, definitions of conditioned invariance were proposed in [12] for two particular classes of models, motivated by the the search for duality properties similar to the 1-D case. The first is yet another subclass of (1) with A 0 = 0, B 1 = B 2 = 0, see also [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consider a basis adapted to J . By (8) it turns out that system (6-7) is asymptotically stable if and only if the two pairs…”
Section: B Internal and External Stability Of Invariant Subspacesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the last two decades, many valuable results have been achieved in the attempt to develop a geometric theory for 2-D systems, [3], [8], [9], [12]. In particular, in [3] a definition of controlled invariance was proposed for Fornasini-Marchesini (FM) models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The geometric approach to 2D linear systems was introduced by Conte and Perdon (1988), Conte et al (1991), Kaczorek (1992), Karmanciolu and Lewis (1990;1992). The problem of internally and externally stabilizing controlled and output-nulling subspaces for 2D FornasiniMarchesini models using state-feedbacks was investigated in (Ntogramatzis, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%