2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2013.05.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A geographically weighted approach to measuring efficiency in panel data: The case of US saving banks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
15
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
2
15
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It is also remarkable to highlight that the coefficient of time is always negative, indicating that during the years of the Lehman crisis the MCBs register significant losses in efficiency. While the nexus between crisis and small banks efficiency deserves to be investigated better, as done by Barra et al (), it is interesting to point out that our evidence is in line with the results provided by Tabak et al (), which focus on US savings banks over the period 2001–2009.…”
Section: Heterogeneity In Mcb Performance: the Empty Mlm And The Timesupporting
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It is also remarkable to highlight that the coefficient of time is always negative, indicating that during the years of the Lehman crisis the MCBs register significant losses in efficiency. While the nexus between crisis and small banks efficiency deserves to be investigated better, as done by Barra et al (), it is interesting to point out that our evidence is in line with the results provided by Tabak et al (), which focus on US savings banks over the period 2001–2009.…”
Section: Heterogeneity In Mcb Performance: the Empty Mlm And The Timesupporting
confidence: 91%
“…It is also remarkable to highlight that the coefficient of time is always negative, indicating that during the years of the Lehman crisis the MCBs register significant losses in efficiency. While the nexus between crisis and small banks efficiency deserves to be investigated better, as done by Barra et al (2016), it is interesting to point out that our evidence is in line with the results provided by Tabak et al (2013), which focus on US savings banks over the period 2001-2009. The province-specific unobservable factors capture 28.27 per cent of the MCB heterogeneity in efficiency, while the remainder is explained by MCBs (23.62%) and time (48.11%; Table 2, column 1). Moving from one model to another, the portion of variance explained by each level Source: Our elaborations on data from ABI and Bank of Italy.…”
Section: Heterogeneity In Mcb Performance: the Empty Mlm And The Timesupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…public or private ownership of capital, the origin (domestic or foreign) of investors, or the nature of the regulations that govern banking activity (Chortareas, Girardone, & Ventouri, 2012Servin, Lensink, & van den Berg, 2012). Lastly, there has been analyses at a global scale (Barth, Lin, Mac, Seade, & Song, 2013;Kösedağ, Denizel, & Özdemir, 2011), as well as in terms of developed countries (Brissimis, Delis, & Tsionas, 2010;Feng & Serletis, 2010;Tabak, Boueri, & Fazio, 2013), and emerging countries or regions (Ariss, 2010;Assaf, Matousek, & Tsionas, 2013;Ray & Das, 2010), and economies in transition (Bonin, Hasan, & Wachtel, 2005;Koutsomanoli-Filippaki, Margaritis, & Staikouras, 2009). …”
Section: Efficiency In the Lac Banking Industry: A Brief Review Of LImentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been applied to the research of China's real estate market [38], but the GWR model are commonly used for cross-sectional data. Although some studies developed expanded version of the cross-sectional GWR analysis to panel data, the method assumes bandwidths and weights generated from the kernel function will remain temporally invariant [39][40][41]. The geographically and temporally weighted regression (GTWR) model incorporates time factors based on the GWR model [33] and can be used to estimate panel data.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%