2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.115398
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Geographical Information System based framework to identify optimal location and size of biomass energy plants using single or multiple biomass types

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The de ned distance of 30 km (Fig. 2) was a contrast to Jayarathna et al [22], who recommended 100 km, and Viana et al [13] with 35 km; the differences are due to the electricity and transportation costs of each country in addition to the maximum available energy capacity of the regions under study.…”
Section: Importance Of Biomass Distance In Power Plantsmentioning
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The de ned distance of 30 km (Fig. 2) was a contrast to Jayarathna et al [22], who recommended 100 km, and Viana et al [13] with 35 km; the differences are due to the electricity and transportation costs of each country in addition to the maximum available energy capacity of the regions under study.…”
Section: Importance Of Biomass Distance In Power Plantsmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…The potential for plant location was evaluated with a scale from 1 to 100, where values close to 1 show impossibility to develop the plant and values close to 100 considered the project viable. In addition, using a combustion process with a second-generation combustion plant for mixed dry biomass processing was considered [22].…”
Section: Variables For Determining the Best Plant Locationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 seed and oil for each township, we pre-exclude some townships by imposing relevant economic constraints for crushing plants, such as economically viable road and rail access [32]. Pre-exclusion eliminates non-feasible sites and thereby reduces computations in the site location analysis [33,34].…”
Section: Candidate Site Pre-exclusionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accordingly, they generate 4 site suitability classes from least suitable to best suitable to evaluate the relevance of the potential areas in terms of solar PV power. Regarding dispatchable resources (no time involved) such as biomass, Jayarathna et al [14] have applied GIS and fuzzy multi-criteria analysis in order to find the optimal sites (location, size) for bio-energy power plants in Queensland, Australia. GIS allows the exclusion of unsuitable locations, then fuzzy logic is applied to standardize the chosen criteria, and finally AHP is used to assign weights to those criteria.…”
Section: Re Planning and Spatiotemporal Modeling: A Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%