2002
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-59388-8_5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Geographic Database Approach to the KT Boundary

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 175 publications
0
18
1
Order By: Relevance
“…So far, 345 K-T boundary sites are recorded in KTbase. The completeness of K-T sections is often debated (see discussion in Kiessling and Claeys, 2001). Biostratigraphic correlation and precision between marine and continental location can be problematic.…”
Section: Completeness Criteriamentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…So far, 345 K-T boundary sites are recorded in KTbase. The completeness of K-T sections is often debated (see discussion in Kiessling and Claeys, 2001). Biostratigraphic correlation and precision between marine and continental location can be problematic.…”
Section: Completeness Criteriamentioning
confidence: 98%
“…These so-called incomplete sites cannot be used to study ejecta distribution patterns, but they might be used to understand some aspects of the K-T extinction (Kiessling and Claeys, 2001).…”
Section: Completeness Criteriamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…). However, while such changes have been documented across the K–Pg boundary on a regional scale on the northern hemisphere, very few records exist from the southern hemisphere because of the scarcity of outcrops of sediments of this age (Kiessling & Claeys ). This emphasizes the need for additional studies on K–Pg boundary sections in the southern hemisphere.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the contrary, Keller et al (2003Keller et al ( , 2007 proposed that the Chicxulub impact predates the KPB by 300,000 years and did not cause the lateCretaceous mass extinctions or have any significant environmental effects. Their proposal is, however, inconsistent with the currently favoured interpretation that various palaeontological, mineralogical and geochemical data as well geological data all provide support for the genetic relationship between the Chicxulub impact and the deposition of spherule layers of the marine proximal and distal boundary sections worldwide, (Smit 1999;Arenillas et al 2000a,b;Montanari & Koeberl 2000;Kiessling & Claeys 2001;Alegret et al 2002a,b ;Ortega-Huertas et al 2002;Arz et al 2004;Smit et al 2004 ;D'Hondt 2005;Molina et al 2006;Schulte et al 2006). In addition, a number of recent experimental results and observations strongly support the single Chicxulub impact (Griscom & Beltran-Lopez 2002 ;Trinquier et al 2006;Arenillas et al 2006;Morgan et al 2006;Coccioni and Marsili 2007;MacLeod et al 2007 ;Kaminski et al 2008;Schulte et al 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%