2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.precamres.2021.106463
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A geochronological review of magmatism along the external margin of Columbia and in the Grenville-age orogens forming the core of Rodinia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0
2

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 380 publications
0
15
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…(2020), and Johansson et al. (2021). The most up‐to‐date boundaries, which we call “Model‐1,” are proposed in Figure 18a.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(2020), and Johansson et al. (2021). The most up‐to‐date boundaries, which we call “Model‐1,” are proposed in Figure 18a.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Different models for the boundaries of these provinces have been proposed. Based on increasing availability of radiometric dates, the model of Tassinari and Macambira (1999) and Tassinari and Macambira (2004) has evolved through Cordani et al (2016), Teixeira et al (2019), Macambira et al (2020), andJohansson et al (2021). The most up-to-date boundaries, which we call "Model-1," are proposed in Figure 18a.…”
Section: Lithospheric Thickness and Geochronological Provinces In The Acmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, 1800-1740 Ma zircons are absent in the studied sample, whereas this age interval corresponds to the time of active intraplate magmatism in the Ukrainian Shield [55,56,57]. Zircons with ages of 2150-2050 Ma are also absent in the studied sample, whereas rocks of this age are widely distributed in the Ukrainian Shield [58,59,60,61]. The studied sample contains a small number of ca.…”
Section: Provenance Of the Volyn-orsha Basin Sedimentsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Many studies have suggested a strong link between Baltica and Amazonia during the Proterozoic (e.g., [56,61,72,73]. The available information indicates that these continents possibly existed as a single entity in Nuna and Rodinia supercontinents until Rodinia breakup in the late Neoproterozoic (e.g., [37,63,74,75,76,77,78,79].…”
Section: Possible Link To Amazoniamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This temporally and spatially extensive accretionary belt, the Great Proterozoic Accretionary Orogen (Fig. 3) (GPAO; Condie, 2013;Roberts, 2013), produced calc-alkaline I-type magmatism and significant crustal growth along the margins of SE Laurentia, SW Baltica and SW Amazonia (Whitmeyer and Karlstrom, 2007;Johansson, 2009;Johansson et al, 2022). The extent of the GPAO around the entirety of the Columbia supercontinent is not well constrained, but likely included other continents where magmatism of this timeframe is known (e.g., Kalahari, North China Craton, Siberia, India; Li et al, 2021;Wang et al, 2022;Roberts, 2013;Elming et al, 2021).…”
Section: I-type Magmatism and Circum-columbian Accretionary Beltsmentioning
confidence: 99%