bLeptospirosis, an emerging zoonotic disease, remains poorly understood because of a lack of genetic manipulation tools available for pathogenic leptospires. Current genetic manipulation techniques include insertion of DNA by random transposon mutagenesis and homologous recombination via suicide vectors. This study describes the construction of a shuttle vector, pMaORI, that replicates within saprophytic, intermediate, and pathogenic leptospires. The shuttle vector was constructed by the insertion of a 2.9-kb DNA segment including the parA, parB, and rep genes into pMAT, a plasmid that cannot replicate in Leptospira spp. and contains a backbone consisting of an aadA cassette, ori R6K, and oriT RK2/RP4. The inserted DNA segment was isolated from a 52-kb region within Leptospira mayottensis strain 200901116 that is not found in the closely related strain L. mayottensis 200901122. Because of the size of this region and the presence of bacteriophage-like proteins, it is possible that this region is a result of a phage-related genomic island. The stability of the pMaORI plasmid within pathogenic strains was tested by passaging cultures 10 times without selection and confirming the presence of pMaORI. Concordantly, we report the use of trans complementation in the pathogen Leptospira interrogans. Transformation of a pMaORI vector carrying a functional copy of the perR gene in a null mutant background restores the expression of PerR and susceptibility to hydrogen peroxide comparable to that of wild-type cells.In conclusion, we demonstrate the replication of a stable plasmid vector in a large panel of Leptospira strains, including pathogens. The shuttle vector described will expand our ability to perform genetic manipulation of Leptospira spp. L eptospirosis, which is caused by one of the 10 pathogenic Leptospira spp. described to date, is a neglected zoonotic disease that has a worldwide distribution with a high incidence in tropical countries. The virulence mechanisms and, more generally, the biology of pathogenic Leptospira spp. remain largely unknown. This hindrance is partly due to a lack of efficient genetic tools available for use in pathogenic Leptospira spp. (1, 2). While genetic modification tools allow flexible manipulation of the genome of the saprophyte Leptospira biflexa, including targeted mutagenesis and cis/trans complementation (2), genetic modification of the pathogen is limited primarily to random transposon mutagenesis.Previously, genetic analysis of Leptospira was impeded by the absence of methods for the introduction of DNA into leptospiral cells. Currently, DNA can be introduced into Leptospira spp. by electroporation (3) or conjugation between Escherichia coli and Leptospira spp. by using RP4 derivative conjugative plasmids (4). Transformed Leptospira can be visualized on solid medium as subsurface colonies after 1 week for saprophytes and up to 4 weeks for pathogens. Markers for the selection of transformants include kanamycin, spectinomycin, and gentamicin resistance cassettes (3, 5, 6). The r...