2017
DOI: 10.1111/age.12593
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A genome‐wide association study suggests new candidate genes for milk production traits in Chinese Holstein cattle

Abstract: A genome-wide association study (GWAS) was conducted on 15 milk production traits in Chinese Holstein. The experimental population consisted of 445 cattle, each genotyped by the GGP (GeneSeek genomic profiling)-BovineLD V3 SNP chip, which had 26 151 public SNPs in its manifest file. After data cleaning, 20 326 SNPs were retained for the GWAS. The phenotypes were estimated breeding values of traits, provided by a public dairy herd improvement program center that had been collected once a month for 3 years. Two … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
(16 reference statements)
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, GWAS with contiguous genome assemblies identified candidate loci associated with tuberculosis susceptibility and recombination hot spots in wild boar and Soay sheep, respectively (Johnston, Bérénos, Slate, & Pemberton, ; Queirós, Alves, Vicente, Gortázar, & de la Fuente, ). GWAS and genomic selection are now routine approaches to improve selective breeding in agriculture and horticulture, for example to investigate beef and milk production traits in cattle (Sorbolini et al, ; Yue et al, ) and growth and fatness in pigs (Guo et al, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, GWAS with contiguous genome assemblies identified candidate loci associated with tuberculosis susceptibility and recombination hot spots in wild boar and Soay sheep, respectively (Johnston, Bérénos, Slate, & Pemberton, ; Queirós, Alves, Vicente, Gortázar, & de la Fuente, ). GWAS and genomic selection are now routine approaches to improve selective breeding in agriculture and horticulture, for example to investigate beef and milk production traits in cattle (Sorbolini et al, ; Yue et al, ) and growth and fatness in pigs (Guo et al, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Genome-wide association study (GWAS) is a commonly used strategy to identify potential genetic variants underlying important complex traits in human and domestic animals. So far, some candidate genes and QTL regions for milk production traits have been detected with GWA studies in dairy cattle, such as DLGAP1, AP2B1, SCD, BTA11 (1.59 ~ 3.37 Mbp), and BTA3 (70.34 ~ 73.69 Mbp) [11][12][13][14][15][16]. In our previous GWAS for milk FAs in Chinese Holstein cows, 83 genome-wide signi cant single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were detected in total [15], in which, two SNPs (ARS-BFGL-NGS-109493 and BTA-56389-no-rs) associated with C18index (P = 0.0459), were located in the upstream of 1-acylglycerol-3phosphate O-acyltransferase 3 (AGPAT3) gene.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SNPs from the X chromosome were counted due to the overall majority of female individuals in the study population. After the data quality control procedure (Yue et al, 2017;Yan et al, 2019), 361 animals with 41,092 SNP genotypes were finally retained for the subsequent GWAS analysis. Physical map length, the number of SNPs, and the SNP density on each chromosome, before and after the data cleaning procedure, are shown in Supplementary Table S2.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The similarity might reflect the sharing of breeding histories among the cattle. Multidimensional scaling (MDS) analysis of 12,380 independent SNP markers (Purcell et al, 2007;Yue et al, 2017;Yan et al, 2019) with r 2 < 0.2 (Wang et al, 2009), using the first and the second components, indicating that there was slight population stratification (Supplementary Figure S2). To better correct cryptic population stratification, the first MDS component was used to be the covariate in the following genome-wide association analysis (Supplementary Figure S3).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation