2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2014.11.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A genome-wide association study of suicide severity scores in bipolar disorder

Abstract: Our GWAS findings suggest that likely many gene variants of small effects contribute collectively to the risk for suicidal behaviour severity in BD. Larger independent replications are required to strengthen the findings from the GWAS presented here.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
34
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
1
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We attempted to replicate the TGFRB1 findings from this study using available GWAS data from a replication bipolar disorder sample that was collected from the Institute of Psychiatry in London, UK [22, 23]. The TGFBR1 gene was not significant in the gene-based analysis in the replication sample.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…We attempted to replicate the TGFRB1 findings from this study using available GWAS data from a replication bipolar disorder sample that was collected from the Institute of Psychiatry in London, UK [22, 23]. The TGFBR1 gene was not significant in the gene-based analysis in the replication sample.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Suicidal behavior severity was assessed for the lifetime worst depressive episode by the interviewer using the SCAN Suicide Severity item, with 0 meaning nonsuicidal ( n = 71), 1 denoting suicidal ideation/plan ( n = 78), 2 denoting suicide attempt without serious harm ( n = 37), 3 indicating suicide attempt with serious harm ( n = 11), and 4 indicating suicide attempt aiming to end life ( n = 22). The self-reported European ancestry of the sample was validated with GWAS data from a previous study [23] and is briefly described for the replication sample below.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations