2018
DOI: 10.5713/ajas.17.0440
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A genome-wide association study of social genetic effects in Landrace pigs

Abstract: ObjectiveThe genetic effects of an individual on the phenotypes of its social partners, such as its pen mates, are known as social genetic effects. This study aims to identify the candidate genes for social (pen-mates’) average daily gain (ADG) in pigs by using the genome-wide association approach.MethodsSocial ADG (sADG) was the average ADG of unrelated pen-mates (strangers). We used the phenotype data (16,802 records) after correcting for batch (week), sex, pen, number of strangers (1 to 7 pigs) in the pen, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
11
1
Order By: Relevance
“…5) The associated gene in bold in this column represent these genes were associated with traits based on annotation. 6) down/up = the location of SNP in downstream/upstream of the nearest gene.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…5) The associated gene in bold in this column represent these genes were associated with traits based on annotation. 6) down/up = the location of SNP in downstream/upstream of the nearest gene.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over the past 20 years, the dense genome coverage provided by high-throughput chip genotyping makes it possible to exploit the linkage disequilibrium (LD) between single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and quantitative trait locus (QTL) through genome-wide association study (GWAS) to identify genes related to traits of interest. Several GWAS have been revealed significant associations for economically important traits such as reproduction traits [5], growth traits [6], meat traits [7], and feed conversion [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the Illumina PorcineSNP60 v2 BeadChip panel, Hong et al . 24 identified several genomic regions and candidate genes associated with SGE for ADG in Landrace pigs. In their study, the individual ADG and the average ADG of unrelated pen-mates were directly used as DGE and SGE, respectively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A total of 1,041 Landrace pigs were genotyped using the Illumina PorcineSNP60 v2 BeadChip panel, which included 61,565 SNP markers 56 . This population was previously used in GWAS for the naïve SGE 45 . The quality control process of the genotype data included the removal of individuals with pedigree errors, omission of monomorphic SNP genotypes, SNPs on sex chromosomes or SNPs with minor allele frequencies (< 0.95), genotype call rate of < 0.90, animal missing rate of > 0.90, Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium of 0.15, and the SNPs with displaced segregation distortion 57,58 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We previously reported the identification of several QTLs for SGE and DGE using a standard GWAS approach 45 . In the previous study, the mean phenotypic value of ADG for unrelated pen partners and the phenotypic value of individual ADG were used as the naïve SGE and DGE for the GWAS, respectively.…”
Section: Dge On Adgmentioning
confidence: 99%