A genome-scale mining strategy for recovering novel rapidly-evolving nuclear single-copy genes for addressing shallow-scale phylogenetics in Hydrangea

Abstract

BackgroundIdentifying orthologous molecular markers that potentially resolve relationships at and below species level has been a major challenge in molecular phylogenetics over the past decade. Non-coding regions of nuclear low- or single-copy markers are a vast and promising source of data providing information for shallow-scale phylogenetics. Taking advantage of public transcriptome data from the One Thousand Plant Project (1KP), we developed a genome-scale mining strategy for recovering potentially orthologous single-copy markers to address low-scale phylogenetics. Our marker design targeted the amplification of intron-rich nuclear single-copy regions from genomic DNA. As a case study we used Hydrangea section Cornidia, one of the most recently diverged lineages within Hydrangeaceae (Cornales), for comparing the performance of three of these nuclear markers to other “fast” evolving plastid markers.ResultsOur data mining and filtering process retrieved 73 putative nuclear single-copy genes which are potentially useful for resolving phylogenetic relationships at a range of divergence depths within Cornales. The three assessed nuclear markers showed considerably more phylogenetic signal for shallow evolutionary depths than conventional plastid markers. Phylogenetic signal in plastid markers increased less markedly towards deeper evolutionary divergences. Potential phylogenetic noise introduced by nuclear markers was lower than their respective phylogenetic signal across all evolutionary depths. In contrast, plastid markers showed higher probabilities for introducing phylogenetic noise than signal at the deepest evolutionary divergences within the tribe Hydrangeeae (Hydrangeaceae).ConclusionsWhile nuclear single-copy markers are highly informative for shallow evolutionary depths without introducing phylogenetic noise, plastid markers might be more appropriate for resolving deeper-level divergences such as the backbone relationships of the Hydrangeaceae family and deeper, at which non-coding parts of nuclear markers could potentially introduce noise due to elevated rates of evolution. The herein developed and demonstrated transcriptome based mining strategy has a great potential for the design of novel and highly informative nuclear markers for a range of plant groups and evolutionary scales.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12862-015-0416-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

More on the Best Evolutionary Rate for Phylogenetic Analysis

“…The two next-best methods are the signal-and-noise analysis ( Townsend et al 2012 ) which is very similar in its requirements to PR, and Fisher information ( Goldman 1998 ). The signal-noise analysis has been used recently for experimental design in phylogenomic studies at shallow and deep levels of divergence ( Mendoza et al 2015 ; Prum et al 2015 ) and given our results certainly is a promising approach. Although statistically very sound, Fisher information is computationally prohibitive for trees of more than about 10 taxa and requires specification of a full model tree.…”

Evolution of Epiphytism and Fruit Traits Act Unevenly on the Diversification of the Species-Rich Genus Peperomia (Piperaceae)

“…We set the smoothing parameter to 0, allowing the full range of rate variation among branches. As there are no fossils recorded for Peperomia , we decided to set the tree height to 1 to avoid temporal bias (e.g., Granados Mendoza et al, 2015 ). All trees were subsequently rescaled assigning branch tips to time 0 and root to time 1.…”

Comparison of taxon‐specific versus general locus sets for targeted sequence capture in plant phylogenomics

“…These include the conserved ortholog set (COSII) in euasterids (Wu et al., ), shared single‐copy nuclear genes (APVO SSC genes) in angiosperms (Duarte et al., ), the pentatricopeptide repeat (PPR) gene family in angiosperms (Yuan et al., ), other low‐copy nuclear genes conserved across angiosperms (Zhang et al., ), and universal markers developed for individual families (e.g., Chapman et al., ; Curto et al., ). The utility of these general locus sets in comparison with taxon‐specific locus sets in targeted sequence capture and phylogenomics has not been evaluated (but see Granados Mendoza et al., ; Buddenhagen et al., ; Léveillé‐Bourret et al., ).…”