2006
DOI: 10.1080/14620316.2006.11512118
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A genetic linkage map of an inter-specific diploidFragariaBC1mapping population and its comparison with theFragariareference map (FV FN)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For one locus (MdACAULIS4), the heterozygous products generated by sequencing from the FV × FN bin set seedlings were difficult to interpret unambiguously. This locus was mapped in the 815×903 BC diploid Fragaria population of Nier et al (2006) to confirm its map position, following the methods described above for mapping in Malus.…”
Section: Sequence Identification and Primer Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For one locus (MdACAULIS4), the heterozygous products generated by sequencing from the FV × FN bin set seedlings were difficult to interpret unambiguously. This locus was mapped in the 815×903 BC diploid Fragaria population of Nier et al (2006) to confirm its map position, following the methods described above for mapping in Malus.…”
Section: Sequence Identification and Primer Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…"Totem" (F × T; Fernández-Fernández et al 2008), the diploid Fragaria reference bin mapping population (N=6) Fragaria vesca 815 × Fragaria nubicola 601 F 2 (FV × FN; Sargent et al 2008), and the Prunus reference bin mapping population (N=6) Prunus dulcis "Texas" × P. persica "Earlygold" F 2 (T × E; Howad et al 2005). An additional diploid Fragaria population-the 815×903BC population (N=93) of Nier et al (2006)was used to confirm the map position of one marker where the segregation scores produced using the FV × FN bin set were ambiguous. DNA was extracted from all progenies using the DNeasy Plant minikit (Qiagen) according the manufacturer's protocol and diluted 1:10 for use in PCR.…”
Section: Plant Materials and Dna Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, this study showed high levels of colinearity between the homoeologous linkage groups in the cultivated strawberry and their corresponding diploid linkage groups, indicating that there were no major chromosomal rearrangements during the polyploidization events that gave rise to the octoploid progenitor species and ultimately to F.×ananassa. A parallel mapping study of a diploid wide cross between F. vesca and F. viridis also showed no major translocations or other rearrangements disrupting marker order between the species [54]. Indeed, it appears that there is much promise for comparative mapping within and across ploidy levels in Fragaria.…”
Section: Linkage Mapping and Genome Structurementioning
confidence: 97%
“…In genetic mapping of diploid Fragaria plants, F2 population obtained from self-pollination or intercross of F1 has been used most frequently (Williamson et al 1995;Davis & Yu 1997;Deng & Davis 2001;Sargent et al 2004Sargent et al , 2006Sargent et al , 2007Sargent et al , 2008Sargent et al , 2011Ruiz-Rojas et al 2010;Illa et al 2011;Zorrilla-Fontanesi et al 2011b;Koskela et al 2012). However, some outline maps of F. vesca and F. viridis were elaborated on the basis of backcross population (BC), generated by crossing F1 individual(s) with inbred parent used in the initial cross (Nier et al 2006;Cekic et al 2001;Albani et al 2004). Also F3 population, obtained by crossing between F2 individuals, was successfully used for generating diploid Fragaria map .…”
Section: Speciesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The majority of segregating populations used for mapping genomes of Fragaria species contained 50 to 100 individuals Davis & Yu 1997;Haymes et al 1997;Sargent et al 2004Sargent et al , 2006Sargent et al , 2007Nier et al 2006;Rousseau-Gueutin et al 2008;Koskela et al 2012). Since more abundant progeny carries a greater number of meiotic recombination events, thus, it determines the resolution and accuracy of the linkage map more precisely (Paterson 1996), larger segregating populations of over 100 individuals were introduced in the study on F. vesca (Koskela et al 2012), F. virginiana and F. chiloensis (Spigler et al 2008Goldberg et al 2010) as well as F. × ananassa (Lerceteau-Köhler et al 2003, 2012Rousseau-Gueutin et al 2008Weebadde et al 2008;Sargent et al 2009Isobe et al 2012;Gaston et al 2013;van Dijk et al 2014).…”
Section: Speciesmentioning
confidence: 99%