1995
DOI: 10.4098/at.arch.95-49
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A genetic investigation of enzyme polymorphisms shared by wolf and dog: suggestions for conservation of the wolf in Italy

Abstract: In order to provide suggestions for conservation and management of the wolf Canis lupus Linnaeus, 1758 in Italy, a total of 46 wolves from central Italy and 53 mongrel dogs were surveyed for electrophoretic variation within and among populations. Six out of 41 presumptive gene loci exhibited polymorphism in the wolf (P = proportion of polymorphic loci = 0.146, 99 per cent criterion), whilst only 3 loci were variable in the dog (P = 0.073). Expected average heterozygosity in the Italian wolf (mean H E = 0.037) … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although protection could have played an ancillary role in the recovery of the wolf, most likely the biological resilience of this species to quickly adapt to positive environmental changes, for example the comeback of forests (Apollonio, 1996) and the associated sharp increase of wild artiodactyls (the natural prey of the wolf) (Pedrotti et al , 2001), has been the key factor promoting its increase in the last 30 years in Italy. Interestingly, even the feared reduction of genetic variability and/or hybridization with free‐ranging dogs (Boitani, 1984) have not occurred or, alternatively, hybrids failed to pass on their genes to later generations (Randi, Lucchini & Francisci, 1993; Lorenzini & Fico, 1995; see also Vilà & Wayne, 1999). Among large mammals, the wolf can have a particularly large litter size (up to 8 cubs/litter; Jędrzejewska et al , 1996), a wide spectrum of food resources (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although protection could have played an ancillary role in the recovery of the wolf, most likely the biological resilience of this species to quickly adapt to positive environmental changes, for example the comeback of forests (Apollonio, 1996) and the associated sharp increase of wild artiodactyls (the natural prey of the wolf) (Pedrotti et al , 2001), has been the key factor promoting its increase in the last 30 years in Italy. Interestingly, even the feared reduction of genetic variability and/or hybridization with free‐ranging dogs (Boitani, 1984) have not occurred or, alternatively, hybrids failed to pass on their genes to later generations (Randi, Lucchini & Francisci, 1993; Lorenzini & Fico, 1995; see also Vilà & Wayne, 1999). Among large mammals, the wolf can have a particularly large litter size (up to 8 cubs/litter; Jędrzejewska et al , 1996), a wide spectrum of food resources (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because all members of the genus Canis are known to hybridize, a hybrid between a female dog and a male wolf will be identified as dog and not wolf (and vice versa). However, several studies using both mtDNA (Wayne et al, 1992;Randi, Francisci & Lucchini, 1995;Vilà & Wayne, 1999;Randi et al, 2000) and allozyme markers (Randi, Lucchini & Francisci, 1993;Lorenzini & Fico, 1995) do not demonstrate serious introgression between dogs and wolves in Europe.…”
Section: Efficiency Of Non-invasive Genetic Sampling For Species Idenmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Nevertheless, in our view there is enough evidence in hand now to be confident of the main framework of the story. The critical evidence comes from investigation of three contrasting genetic componentsthe maternally inherited mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA; Vilà et al 1997Vilà et al , 1999Savolainen et al 2002;Leonard et al 2002;Pang et al 2009;Pilot et al 2010;Druzhkova et al 2013;Thalman et al 2013), the paternally inherited Y-chromosome (Bannasch et al 2005;Sacks et al 2008Sacks et al , 2013Brown et al 2011;Ding et al 2012), and the biparental autosomal genes and other components of the nuclear genome (Wayne & O'Brien 1987;Lorenzini & Fico 1995;Garcia-Moreno et al 1996;Hedrick et al 1997;Lindblad-Toh et al 2005;Gray et al 2009;vonHoldt et al 2010vonHoldt et al , 2011Vaysse et al 2011;Axelsson et al 2013;Wang et al 2013;Freedman et al 2014;Skoglund et al 2015).…”
Section: Matters Of Evidence-origin Of the Dingo And Its Distinguishimentioning
confidence: 99%