2002
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-294x.2002.01577.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A genetic assessment of parentage in a natural population of dollar sunfish (Lepomis marginatus) based on microsatellite markers

Abstract: We employ microsatellite markers to assess mating tactics in Lepomis marginatus. Genetic assignments for 1015 progeny in 23 nests indicate that about 95% of the offspring were sired by their respective nest-guardians, a finding consistent with the apparent absence of a brood parasitic morphotype in this species. Allopaternal care was documented in two nests, one resulting from a nest takeover, the other from cuckoldry by an adjoining nest-tender. Clustered de novo mutations also were identified. About 2.5 fema… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
2
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
16
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The program PARENT-AGE identiWed 16 new mutations among the 682 young surveyed at four loci (5,456 alleles in total), thus yielding an estimated mutation rate of 2.9 £ 10 ¡3 . This rate is similar to those detected in various other microsatellite studies (Weber and Wong 1993;Hancock 1999;Mackiewicz et al 2002). It should be also noted that this estimate encompasses any mis-scoring of alleles (i.e., we did not distinguish de novo mutation from possible mis-scoring for the aberrant alleles in our analysis).…”
Section: Microsatellite Markers and Genetic Population Summarysupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The program PARENT-AGE identiWed 16 new mutations among the 682 young surveyed at four loci (5,456 alleles in total), thus yielding an estimated mutation rate of 2.9 £ 10 ¡3 . This rate is similar to those detected in various other microsatellite studies (Weber and Wong 1993;Hancock 1999;Mackiewicz et al 2002). It should be also noted that this estimate encompasses any mis-scoring of alleles (i.e., we did not distinguish de novo mutation from possible mis-scoring for the aberrant alleles in our analysis).…”
Section: Microsatellite Markers and Genetic Population Summarysupporting
confidence: 90%
“…We ran ten replicate simulations for three mutation rates (1 9 10 -3 , 1 9 10 -4 , 1 9 10 -5 ) and N e values of 50, 100, 250, 500, and 1,000, 5,000, and 10,000 to fully encompass the empirical longterm estimates of N e . Mutation rate estimates for microsatellites have a large degree of uncertainty (Ellegren 2004) but the typical range observed by most studies to date has been 1 9 10 -3 -1 9 10 -5 (Jones et al 1999;Shimoda et al 1999;MacKiewicz et al 2002;Steinberg et al 2002;Ellegren 2004;Yue et al 2007). Simulations were started with minimal variation and we recorded the final H S after 2,500 generations.…”
Section: Above-barrier Populationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several recent studies using microsatellite DNA markers for paternity analysis have focused on reproductive behavior and variability in male reproductive success (22,23). The parents of an individual also can be identified based on likelihood statistics using hypervariable microsatellite markers.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%