2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.cie.2022.108754
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A genetic algorithm for proactive project scheduling with resource transfer times

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a similar vein, in [29], the authors provide a solution to the same problem (when now the tasks are allowed to be interrupted at discrete times) using a GA, while in [33] the same problem is addressed using a quantum-inspired GA that differs from the classical GA in the way the initial and the updated populations are implemented. In [34] authors investigate the resource-constrained project scheduling problem with resource transfer times under uncertain environment using GA. Hybrid approaches [37] combine the power of different kind of algorithms (ILPs, metaheuristics, heuristics) to solve large scale problems.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a similar vein, in [29], the authors provide a solution to the same problem (when now the tasks are allowed to be interrupted at discrete times) using a GA, while in [33] the same problem is addressed using a quantum-inspired GA that differs from the classical GA in the way the initial and the updated populations are implemented. In [34] authors investigate the resource-constrained project scheduling problem with resource transfer times under uncertain environment using GA. Hybrid approaches [37] combine the power of different kind of algorithms (ILPs, metaheuristics, heuristics) to solve large scale problems.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inspired by existing methods, there are mainly two strategies for tackling activity duration uncertainty. One of the strategies is robust project scheduling (Van de Vonder et al., 2008; Ma et al., 2022; Peng et al., 2023). The approach generates a baseline schedule that can absorb the execution variability as much as possible.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%