2003
DOI: 10.3233/ida-2003-7103
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A genetic algorithm for cluster analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
74
0
2

Year Published

2005
2005
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 113 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
74
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Section 2 formalizes the clustering problem to be tackled by means of evolutionary algorithms. Section 3 reviews the clustering genetic algorithm (CGA) [23], whereas Section 4 proposes improvements on it. Section 5 reports results involving six gene-expression datasets.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Section 2 formalizes the clustering problem to be tackled by means of evolutionary algorithms. Section 3 reviews the clustering genetic algorithm (CGA) [23], whereas Section 4 proposes improvements on it. Section 5 reports results involving six gene-expression datasets.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The clustering genetic algorithm (CGA) [23], originally designed to optimize both the number of clusters and the corresponding data partition, is adopted here as a starting point algorithm, from which more efficient evolutionary algorithms for clustering gene-expression data are derived. These algorithms were briefly introduced in a previous work [22], in which five bioinformatics datasets were used for performance assessment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…GAs are search procedures that use the mechanics of evolution and natural genetics. They have been earlier reported for the clustering problem (Lucasius et al, 1993;Murthy and Chowdhury, 1996;Scheunders, 1997;Estivill-Castro and Murray, 1997;Falkenauer, 1998;Hall et al, 1999;Krishna, 1999;Maulik and Bandyopadhyay, 2000;Bandyopadhyay and Maulik, 2000;Hruschka and Nelson, 2003;Yi, 2004). However, they may take a large amount of time to converge and/or assume the number of clusters to be fixed a priori.…”
mentioning
confidence: 68%
“…Standard genetic operators are usually not suitable for clustering problems for several reasons, as detailed in Falkenauer (1998), Hruschka and Ebecken (2003), Hruschka et al (2006). In brief, such operators often just manipulate objects by means of their corresponding cluster labels, without taking into account their connections with other clusters.…”
Section: Evolutionary Algorithm For Fuzzy C-means Clustering (Eac-fcm)mentioning
confidence: 99%