2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2011.05.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A generic real-time TaqMan assay for specific detection of lapinized Chinese vaccines against classical swine fever

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With a limited number of sequences available for designing primers and probes specific for the two types of astroviruses, it was hard to ensure that the assay initially developed would be able to detect "specifically" the target virus in an expanding range of new samples. Lack of type-specific virus isolates would make it even harder, which is opposite to the development of a real-time RT-PCR assay for detection of CSFV where reference pestiviral RNA panel and virus isolates of different genotype are available for validation (Liu et al, 2011b). It is likely that the PAstV1 primers and/or probe shared high sequence similarity with other astroviruses, resulting in a low specificity, which was only revealed by a metagenomic approach.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With a limited number of sequences available for designing primers and probes specific for the two types of astroviruses, it was hard to ensure that the assay initially developed would be able to detect "specifically" the target virus in an expanding range of new samples. Lack of type-specific virus isolates would make it even harder, which is opposite to the development of a real-time RT-PCR assay for detection of CSFV where reference pestiviral RNA panel and virus isolates of different genotype are available for validation (Liu et al, 2011b). It is likely that the PAstV1 primers and/or probe shared high sequence similarity with other astroviruses, resulting in a low specificity, which was only revealed by a metagenomic approach.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The HCLV vaccine (C-strain) belongs to CSFV 1.1 genogroup and was used in Spain in the 1980s for CSF control. This vaccine has 100% homology with the Z46258 strain into the N pro region [ 7 ]. Finally, the Thiverval vaccine strain (provided by Pasteur Institute, Romania) was used as the stimulus in the Elispot assay for detecting CSFV-specific interferon-gamma (IFN-γ) producing cells.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The HCLV vaccine was developed in China, by passage in rabbits. Because of its high efficacy and safety, the HCLV vaccine was introduced into many other countries and became known as the Chinese vaccine strain (C-strain) [ 7 ]. Immune responses elicited by these vaccines do not allow differentiating infected from vaccinated animals (DIVA).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Field-strain specific RT-PCR assays have been developed [22,23], however they rely upon pre-existing sequence information about circulating field strains and are susceptible to viral genome changes as such assays often rely on one or two nucleotide differences between the field strain and vaccine. An alternative approach is to test samples for the presence of all CSFV strains and then apply a vaccine-specific test [17,18,20]. This strategy assumes that an animal is not infected if vaccine-specific RNA is detected in tonsil tissue.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, following a campaign to vaccinate wild boar in Germany using oral baits, C-strain vaccine could be distinguished from the genotype 2.3 field virus in CSFV RNA positive samples obtained from hunted wild boar [19]. Another differential assay has been developed that can distinguish the genetically similar Riemser C-strain, HCLV and LPC vaccine strains from most field strain genotypes except some of the genotype 3 strains [20,21]. Other differential real-time RT-PCR tests have been developed to specifically detect diverse CSFV vaccine strains [22-24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%