2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmst.2021.04.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A generic high-throughput microstructure classification and quantification method for regular SEM images of complex steel microstructures combining EBSD labeling and deep learning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such an understanding is important for transferring the classification workflows to industrial applications. On the other hand, EBSD could also be used to automatically generate annotations for the microstructure classes, as suggested in [25] and done in [20]. This could allow, with a set of correlative micrographs and EBSD-based annotations, the training of a bainite classification scheme, which uses only SEM or even only LM images during application.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Such an understanding is important for transferring the classification workflows to industrial applications. On the other hand, EBSD could also be used to automatically generate annotations for the microstructure classes, as suggested in [25] and done in [20]. This could allow, with a set of correlative micrographs and EBSD-based annotations, the training of a bainite classification scheme, which uses only SEM or even only LM images during application.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Approaches for a more objective ground truth assignment for ML segmentation or classification include Shen et al [20], who use electron backscatter diffraction (EBSD) to generate annotations for DL segmentation of steel microstructures. Müller et al [8] propose the use of EBSD, reference samples, and unsupervised learning as supporting methods for assigning the ground truth, demonstrated on a bainite case study.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it is difficult to obtain the corresponding OM images from the same area of the same steel sample in the study of Azimi, and the model can only distinguish the two‐phase microstructure where the first phase (background) is ferrite, which makes the model represent insufficient generalization ability. Recently, Shen et al [ 27 ] combined EBSD labeling and deep learning to segment different phases, and quantify phase content and grain size on a dual‐phase (DP) steel and a quenching and partitioning (Q&P) steel. In addition, they proposed an extensible microstructural quantification method combining the physical metallurgy (PM)‐guided data augmentation and DL to construct a comprehensive dataset.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A model that can rapidly determine the target performance of complex micro/nanostructures and easily generalize them to similar systems is required to identify laser-textured surfaces with superhydrophobic properties among large design spaces within reasonable time frames. Deep learning, which has been widely used in materials science, can independently extract and learn features and make intelligent decisions to rapidly establish the regression relationship between process parameters or microstructure (inputs) and target performance (outputs). Using a convolutional neural network (CNN), Kim et al effectively developed a prediction model of the stress–strain curves of unidirectional composites with complex microstructures, presenting an interesting example .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%