2010 IEEE 15th Conference on Emerging Technologies &Amp; Factory Automation (ETFA 2010) 2010
DOI: 10.1109/etfa.2010.5640993
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A generic framework for synthesis and optimization of system designs in the example of building automation systems

Abstract: This paper introduces a generic framework that is designed to solve complex system design problems by means of optimization approaches. The framework design is made up of components that are responsible for distinct tasks that communicate by extension points. These extension points are for problem specification and setup, different algorithm workflows, display of plots, optimization statistics, display and export of solutions based on a specified representation, and automated performance analysis. Due to the c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
(4 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Chandrasekara et al [11] discuss about automation and control systems to implement both user comfort and energy consumption. Oezluek [12] expounds a generic framework designed to solve project complex problems of building automation system with several organisms of control and, consequently, different set points and protocols.…”
Section: Control and Automationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Chandrasekara et al [11] discuss about automation and control systems to implement both user comfort and energy consumption. Oezluek [12] expounds a generic framework designed to solve project complex problems of building automation system with several organisms of control and, consequently, different set points and protocols.…”
Section: Control and Automationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Level A : P lighting ≤ P limA (10) Level B : P limA < P lighting ≤ P limB (11) Level C : P limB < P lighting ≤ P limC (12) Level D : P limC < P lighting ≤ P limD (13) Level E : P lighting > P limD (14)…”
Section: Standards Regulations and Certificationsmentioning
confidence: 99%