2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2013.02.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A generative statistical approach to automatic 3D building roof reconstruction from laser scanning data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
82
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 137 publications
(90 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
82
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Among these studies, model-driven methods assume a building is an assembly of roof primitives (e.g., gable roof and hipped roof), which and whose topology are predefined in a model library (Tarsha-Kurdi et al, 2007). To extract roof primitives from LiDAR point clouds, techniques such as invariant moments (Maas and Vosselman, 1999), graph matching (Oude Elberink and Vosselman, 2009;Verma et al, 2006;Xiong et al, 2014), Support Vector Machine (SVM) (Henn et al, 2013;Satari et al, 2012), RANdom SAmple Consensus (RANSAC) (Henn et al, 2013) and Reversible Jump Markov Chain Monte Carlo (RJMCMC) (Huang et al, 2013) are used. However, these approaches tend to fail when reconstructing complex roof shapes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Among these studies, model-driven methods assume a building is an assembly of roof primitives (e.g., gable roof and hipped roof), which and whose topology are predefined in a model library (Tarsha-Kurdi et al, 2007). To extract roof primitives from LiDAR point clouds, techniques such as invariant moments (Maas and Vosselman, 1999), graph matching (Oude Elberink and Vosselman, 2009;Verma et al, 2006;Xiong et al, 2014), Support Vector Machine (SVM) (Henn et al, 2013;Satari et al, 2012), RANdom SAmple Consensus (RANSAC) (Henn et al, 2013) and Reversible Jump Markov Chain Monte Carlo (RJMCMC) (Huang et al, 2013) are used. However, these approaches tend to fail when reconstructing complex roof shapes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the reported studies, 2D-plans (Henn et al, 2013;Kada and McKinley, 2009), graph matching technique (Oude Elberink and Vosselman, 2009;Verma et al, 2006;Xiong et al, 2014) and convexity analysis (Lin et al, 2013) are used for this purpose. Unlike the aforementioned approaches, Huang et al (2013) extract roof primitives one by one from LiDAR points by using the RJMCMC technique. Although these model-driven approaches could perform well for sparse data, they are limited to roof primitives predefined in the model library.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A Bayesian decision finds the optimal configuration of 3D-blockes using a Monte Carlo sampler. Huang et al, (2013) developed top-down combined with bottom-up approaches to reconstruct 3D building models from LiDAR points cloud. Based on a pre-defined primitive library, a generative statistical modelling is conducted to reconstruct roof models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Model-driven approaches choose configurable building blocks from a library of pre-defined templates, determine their roof shape parameters to best fit the given data (see e.g. (Henn et al, 2013)), and possibly combine them with other blocks to generate more complex shapes (Huang et al, 2013). Pure data-driven approaches, on the other hand, aggregate the measured points to form higher order primitives (usually planar regions) and combine them to form surface models without any shape restrictions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%