2018
DOI: 10.1007/s40815-018-0563-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Generalized TOPSIS Method for Intuitionistic Fuzzy Multiple Attribute Group Decision Making Considering Different Scenarios of Attributes Weight Information

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
13
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
13
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, a numerical example for green supplier selection has been proposed to illustrate the new method and some comparisons are also conducted to further illustrate advantages of the new method. In the future, our proposed VIKOR method with 2TLNNs and VIKOR method with IV2TLNNs can be applied to the risk analysis (Wei, Qin, Li, Zhu, & Wei, 2019;Wei, Yu, Liu, & Cao, 2018), the MCGDM problems (Hashemi, Mousavi, Zavadskas, Chalekaee, & Turskis, 2018;Yazdani, Zarate, Coulibaly, & Zavadskas, 2017;Zavadskas, Turskis, Vilutien_ e, & Lepkova, 2017) and many other uncertain and fuzzy environments (Deng & Gao, 2019;Gao, 2018;Gupta, Mehlawat, & Grover, 2019;Li & Lu, 2019;Wang, Gao, & Lu, 2019;Wang, 2019;Wu, Gao, & Wei, 2019;Wu, Wang, & Gao, 2019;Xian, Chai, & Guo, 2019).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, a numerical example for green supplier selection has been proposed to illustrate the new method and some comparisons are also conducted to further illustrate advantages of the new method. In the future, our proposed VIKOR method with 2TLNNs and VIKOR method with IV2TLNNs can be applied to the risk analysis (Wei, Qin, Li, Zhu, & Wei, 2019;Wei, Yu, Liu, & Cao, 2018), the MCGDM problems (Hashemi, Mousavi, Zavadskas, Chalekaee, & Turskis, 2018;Yazdani, Zarate, Coulibaly, & Zavadskas, 2017;Zavadskas, Turskis, Vilutien_ e, & Lepkova, 2017) and many other uncertain and fuzzy environments (Deng & Gao, 2019;Gao, 2018;Gupta, Mehlawat, & Grover, 2019;Li & Lu, 2019;Wang, Gao, & Lu, 2019;Wang, 2019;Wu, Gao, & Wei, 2019;Wu, Wang, & Gao, 2019;Xian, Chai, & Guo, 2019).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…How is the alternative with the best performance determined? There exist lots of different sorts of effective tools to denote decision makers' preference information, where fuzzy set is one of the most concerned [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17]. The Fermatean fuzzy set (FFS) proposed by Senapati and Yager [18] is one of the most well-known and practical tools among them, which mainly restricts the summation of the cubes of the membership degree and the nonmembership degree shall not exceed one.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The uncertainty and fuzziness of complex problems are usually high, which means that the MAGDM model established in the crisp number environment has been difficult to adapt to the real situation. [43][44][45][46] Hence, using FSs to study MADM or MAGDM has become a consensus in this field. [47][48][49] The MABAC method proposed by Pamucar and Cirovic 50 in 2015 is a simple and logical method for solving MAGDM issues.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, most decisions are so complex that they cannot be made by an individual, but by a group of experts which involves the research content of MAGDM. The uncertainty and fuzziness of complex problems are usually high, which means that the MAGDM model established in the crisp number environment has been difficult to adapt to the real situation 43–46 . Hence, using FSs to study MADM or MAGDM has become a consensus in this field 47–49 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%