2023
DOI: 10.1007/s00500-023-07842-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A generalized Shapley index-based interval-valued Pythagorean fuzzy PROMETHEE method for group decision-making

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Jiang et al [37] proposed a PROMETHEE II method based on covering-based variable precision fuzzy rough sets with fuzzy logical operators. Hua and Jing [38] extended the classical PROMETHEE method by incorporating the generalized Shapley value in interval-valued Pythagorean fuzzy sets to achieve a more rigorous ranking outcome. To verify the effectiveness of this approach, a case study is conducted to evaluate sustainable suppliers.…”
Section: Mcdm Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Jiang et al [37] proposed a PROMETHEE II method based on covering-based variable precision fuzzy rough sets with fuzzy logical operators. Hua and Jing [38] extended the classical PROMETHEE method by incorporating the generalized Shapley value in interval-valued Pythagorean fuzzy sets to achieve a more rigorous ranking outcome. To verify the effectiveness of this approach, a case study is conducted to evaluate sustainable suppliers.…”
Section: Mcdm Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The innovation of IVPFS lies in its ability to represent membership degree, non-membership degree, neutrality degree, and abstention degree in the form of interval numbers 25 , 26 . In contrast, the interval-valued Pythagorean fuzzy set is composed of three parts: membership degree, non-membership degree, and hesitancy degree 27 , 28 . IVPFS can better describe and express the uncertainty and fuzziness of DMs in practical decision-making.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the model considered in the study is closest to social networks, where participants, as a rule, are united by common interests and tasks, and relationships of trust of various levels are built. This important problem of trust at various levels in social group negotiations is considered, for example, in the works of (Hua and Jing, 2023;De Vreede et al, 2013), by constructing an index of closeness (disagreement) of initial preferences of group members.…”
Section: Systematic Literature Review 21 Game Theory and Social Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%